Guy said Microsoft showed a ton of big AAA games, so there is tons to be excited about. Guy said what AAA games did you see, implying there wasn't much.
We were talking about the Coalition and the Initiative and you hand waved that awayYea, cuz inXile and Ninja Theory's side projects are what we were talking about when mentioning major announcements. Cmon, dude
I still can't help but laugh at people going through to find bad still frames of games that a player is never going to notice while it's in motion. It's just like... nothing better to do?Too much found on a couple negatives and refusal to look at any of the positives. It's exhausting. But hey, still lots to be hyped and excited about no matter what some are trying to push
Nothing she said isn't true. I don't even know why some people are pushing back against those comments.
My PC is leagues ahead of my Xbox One S, but I've been gaming exclusively on the S for the past month because of Game Pass. I'm playing games I've never been interested in and becoming a fan. Having all their first party offerings available the first day is nice given how cheap Game Pass is. It will save me money in the long haul and if there are times when there is nothing to play I can cancel the subscription and turn it back on when I see something again.
Looking forward to playing Infinite, Fable, Avowed, Hellblade 2, Forza, and Psychonauts 2 on day 1 for $10. As someone said, it can be used as a glorified rental service if you're smart about it.
I know you edited but just wanted to say that I don't think we're ever getting an answer there lol.
InXile's RPG is now a side project and Ninja Theory's projects are just nothing.Yea, cuz inXile and Ninja Theory's side projects are what we were talking about when mentioning major announcements. Cmon, dude
Couldn't you also be playing all their first party offerings on your PC as well?
(edit: I only say this because you said you PC was leagues better than your One S)
What do you mean? Can you explain your point to me again?Thats literally not the point but keep moving them goalposts bra
Wait... you seem to be arguing the same thing as me but it only applies to Sony's games?Guy said Microsoft showed a ton of big AAA games, so there is tons to be excited about. Guy said what AAA games did you see, implying there wasn't much.
Just because some of your aren't excited about what was shown, doesn't mean there is nothing, just means it doesn't hit your tastes. Doesn't mean what they showed doesn't exist or is shit
Which is why I said first party offerings, it seemed like that's what they were talking aboutNot all the games available on console GP are on the PC version. Its why the PC version is cheaper.
I know you edited but just wanted to say that I don't think we're ever getting an answer there lol.
Which is why I said first party offerings, it seemed like that's what they were talking about
edit: Crap, sorry you're the person I quoted, but yea it did seem like you were talking about first party games =p
Absolutely. I can't imagine Sony investing a lot of money into games like Flight Simulator, Gears Tactics. or Age of Empires. I like the direction Microsoft is going.People talk about variety and then don't like variety.
Their output looks far more varied than what's Sony's first party is doing. Nothing wrong with either.
Yea, cuz inXile and Ninja Theory's side projects are what we were talking about when mentioning major announcements. Cmon, dude
The message was more so stop being blinded by console warrior anticsWhich is why I said first party offerings, it seemed like that's what they were talking about
edit: Crap, sorry you're the person I quoted, but yea it did seem like you were talking about first party games =p
inXile's new game is AAA and being built with UE5. They've got Rockstar talent and God of War's lead combat designer working on it so far. Definitely not just a "side project".Yea, cuz inXile and Ninja Theory's side projects are what we were talking about when mentioning major announcements. Cmon, dude
inXile's new game is AAA and being built with UE5. They've got Rockstar talent and God of War's lead combat designer working on it so far. Definitely not just a "side project".
the premise of this is strange because... gamepass is already out and people have given MS their props for gamepass. if gamepass was a new thing then... yeah... people would talk about it more.
gamepass is a service that allows you to play a bunch of games and so people are going to talk about the games?? because that's what gamepass is about...
I think what is being missed (and I think this is a messaging issue that Microsoft isn't winning) is that the value shown at yesterday's show is unprecedented. If we never heard of Game Pass before yesterday and they announced at the end of the show "for $180 you can play everything we showed today and many more games over the next 3 years" people would lose their shit. Many people here have their subscriptions extended for much less than $180. There was billions of dollars of investment on display yesterday and we can access all of it cheap. Every game you're on the fence about, you can try at no additional risk. It's crazy and goes beyond value. It changes the paradigm of how as a gaming consumer, we can explore games and commune about them. Yesterday's show took the service to another level.
Then again, while I feel Alanah is great at what she does, this is really Microsoft's problem. They haven't been able to connect with gaming consumers for a long time despite the fact their marketing is positioned so well. Very few people are talking about Game Pass value after yesterday's show because their marketing and messaging just doesn't land.
I have a feeling kids that play on PC are probably spoiled rotten with Fortnite, Epic Game's free weekly game/s to keep (up to over 130 right now), Amazon/twitch prime games (I think monthly they give out around 5 games, and also free stuff in random games), PS+ free games, Xbox Gold free games. They are filled to the brim with just one or two of those. And then you have games being so cheap now. Spending a constant allowance on a service when you get free stuff + the cheap stuff you know you like and can keep (for PS+ you can't but they usually stay subbed to it) is likely a easy choice for the kid on a budget.Gamepass is a godsend for kids, they don't have the money for all the new games they see their favorite streamers are playing but if they have gamepass they can play the latest and greatest games for a fraction of the cost.
So what you're saying is, if you ignore large chunks of value that gamepass gets you, it still manages to look like it breaks even value wise?The marketing of "low monthly entry fee" is working. It tells us that we can save money (like Alanah said, "It is so good for gamers, it's such a good deal, you save so. much. money."). But like you noted, the reality of a subscription that comes out to $180 a year kind of makes it a harder sell. With the annual mindset, you only begin to "save money" if you had already planned to purchase at least 2-3 XBOX exclusives at $60 full price within a year.
I'm purposely not factoring in availability of third party games on GP as part of the "saving money" argument, because there's no assurance or guarantee that they'll be on the service, or that they'll remain on the service. The analog to this would be if you were a Netflix subscriber in the hopes that they'll eventually-hopefully-maybe put your favorite non-Netflix movie/TV series (back) in rotation.
Of course, older 1st party games available on the service add to its value, but you can always scoop up the games you're actually interested in playing on sale or discount and still probably come out ahead compared to the amount you'd pay for GP annually.
What do the people who make music think about Spotify?It's funny to see how dismissive people are at Gamepass when Spotify and Netflix have done the same in their respective industries.
Huh? Sony lets their devs do exactly what they want pretty much especially if you already find some success. That's the entire mission statement of worldwide studios and MS repeated it as a goal when they starting acquiring studios.Absolutely. I can't imagine Sony investing a lot of money into games like Flight Simulator, Gears Tactics. or Age of Empires. I like the direction Microsoft is going.
For now...
Huh? Sony lets their devs do exactly what they want pretty much especially if you already find some success. That's the entire mission statement of worldwide studios and MS repeated it as a goal when they starting acquiring studios.
The marketing of "low monthly entry fee" is working. It tells us that we can save money (like Alanah said, "It is so good for gamers, it's such a good deal, you save so. much. money."). But like you noted, the reality of a subscription that comes out to $180 a year kind of makes it a harder sell. With the annual mindset, you only begin to "save money" if you had already planned to purchase at least 2-3 XBOX exclusives at $60 full price within a year.
I'm purposely not factoring in availability of third party games on GP as part of the "saving money" argument, because there's no assurance or guarantee that they'll be on the service, or that they'll remain on the service. The analog to this would be if you were a Netflix subscriber in the hopes that they'll eventually-hopefully-maybe put your favorite non-Netflix movie/TV series (back) in rotation.
Of course, older 1st party games available on the service add to its value, but you can always scoop up the games you're actually interested in playing on sale or discount and still probably come out ahead compared to the amount you'd pay for GP annually.
Goalpost-moving Sony bootlicker lmao. So I guess Miles Morales and R&C are side projects, yeah?Yea, cuz inXile and Ninja Theory's side projects are what we were talking about when mentioning major announcements. Cmon, dude
I didn't quite get the point she was making about the industry being money hungry and pumping micro transactions into games, are these things Microsoft has never done?
Did they drop the ball though? I think secretly that don't really care to sell hardware as much as they want everyone to believe. They want to sell a butt load of subscriptions though. Thats the Key to thier whole marketing campain but they dont want to flat out say so.MS/Xbox crew dropped the ball on the messaging and the showing was definitely not one that got people screaming "fuck, i need a Series X at release!"
tbh, all this "Gamepass woohoo!" stuff is annoying at this point. there are first party games on it that don´t materialize for the next years, the other stuff is third party, mostly later than the normal release. also, there are games that many people have already bought and a bunch of indie games which is cool but many people don´t care about that.
And that's my issue. I can't see how that would be viable at all for the games industry as a whole if say Sony and Nintendo adopted the same approach. There are so many devs/publishers. No way that could work out for everyone.The fact that we aren't talking about the sustainability of this system is wild.
Right but she was complaining specifically about Assassins creed giving the ability to speed up leveling, didn't Forza offer very similar boosts for it's economy?You can make in game purchases in some games, but everything can be acquired without spending actual cash. Her point was that its a great value during a time where most people are just trying to yank money out of your wallet.
Kind of weird they have a service that costs about $10 bucks a month that gives people access to well over 100+ games with more to come and all Microsoft Studio games, yet people are trying their best to spin it as a bad thing.
Right but she was complaining specifically about Assassins creed giving the ability to speed up leveling, didn't Forza offer very similar boosts for it's economy?
It's a good value for a game rental service that I use, but this narrative of good guy Microsoft just wanting to offer people value doesn't sound intellectually honest to me.
I didn't get Forza Horizon 4 because of the Poverty (base game) vs VIP Pass, VIP Pass gives you double credits for every reward or something.Right but she was complaining specifically about Assassins creed giving the ability to speed up leveling, didn't Forza offer very similar boosts for it's economy?
It's a good value for a game rental service that I use, but this narrative of good guy Microsoft just wanting to offer people value doesn't sound intellectually honest to me.
I didn't get Forza Horizon 4 because of the Poverty (base game) vs VIP Pass, VIP Pass gives you double credits for every reward or something.
I decided to just wait for a crazy sale, and The Crew 2 beat them to it for me. Got The Crew 2 for $20, it has a VIP pass like thing too. I'm glad I got The Crew 2, planes, hover craft, monster trucks, lots of different disciplines, and I really like the first game with it's car loot drops (TC1 still seem better even without aircraft and loot chests scattered around the USA map).
I don't like Gamepass for the same reason I prefer HBO (quality) over Netflix (quantity).
Right but she was complaining specifically about Assassins creed giving the ability to speed up leveling, didn't Forza offer very similar boosts for it's economy?
It's a good value for a game rental service that I use, but this narrative of good guy Microsoft just wanting to offer people value doesn't sound intellectually honest to me.
All I knew about it was from a review, there's more than double credits looking at the page.Never heard of the VIP pass, but I had a good time with the game. It's really good and worth checking out if you insist on buying it. Best racer I've played this gen.
I have a feeling the price will have to go up as more content gets added to it. If it never go up $5 on PC, and whatever it is on console, then that would be great especially for one month renting.MS are definitely trying to make money on Gamepass no question, they're not doing this out of the goodness of their hearts.
But given the recent subscriber numbers for Gamepass that were released, in the not too distant future let's say 10m are paying for Gamepass accounts avg $8/month (as more people roll off introductory offers into full subs).
It's pretty easy to see that being worth a billion a year in revenue.
And I highly doubt MS are spending close to a billion on locen5sing the content on Gamepass.
All MS is doing is building a subscriber base and then splitting the revenue with those Devs who want in.
I don't like Gamepass for the same reason I prefer HBO (quality) over Netflix (quantity).
And I highly doubt MS are spending close to a billion on locen5sing the content on Gamepass.