Care to provide examples?I think they do. We've tried the playing console games on phones and tablets before and it wasn't something people did a lot compared to how much switch are out there. I don't expect this to change.
I like a big variety of games. Don't get me wrong there are some games on gamepass that I would like or have already played and enjoyed. However I have a pc, PS4 pro and a switch and there is nothing on gamepass that is having my attention at the moment.
I have had gamepass pc since near launch and have played:
gears of War 1, enjoyed but didn't feel in a rush to play another one.
banner saga 1&2 (enjoyed),
Outer worlds, enjoyed but found it a bit lightweight
Vampyr - was enjoying but the game left gamepass before I finished it,
Plague tale - kind of enjoyed but clearly haven't found it very compelling as I haven't been back to it for a long time
So I am not getting good value and should probably drop it. The price is low enough that I haven't bothered to yet!
I truly believe people get jealous of gamepass because Nintendo and Sony does not offer that
Remember when Netflix used to post DVDs to people....these sort of services change over time. xCloud is on iOS now and you can use that as part of Game Pass sub. I would imagine that MS are looking at every possible device to put Game Pass on.
do you honestly believe that people Care that much about whether or not Microsoft make enough money on Gamepass or not? Come on...
Series X is a necessity to retain that core audience short term, nothing more. xbox are not all in on next gen in the same way Sony are with PS5, that's clear.
But IMO no, even gamepass is not the thing they want to sell first and foremost, at least not GP itself in the longer term. The real prize and potential golden goose is what gamepass offers the potential for, especially with 1P content. There's an ongoing base subscription, yes, fine, but it's not going to be sustainable on that alone. What is necessary are further ongoing payments, micro transactions, pico payments, service games that bring in more $ than one and dones ever could. This will, positively has to, alter the types of games xbox 1P produce, how they produce them, the standard to which they produce them and their cadence. It'll also affect greenlighting of third party as time goes by. This is why Halo is now Infinite and why practically everything else will lean towards this model.
There's also a potential industry-wide downside to gamepass and anything like it, that not many people consider or want to entertain, in that it devalues games themselves. It absolutely will pressure the way games are funded, designed and concieved. Gamepass might currently be allowing a number of small indies a safety net and stress-free, guaranteed path to market - we've seen a few devs state exactly this - but they'd be thinking very short-term and blinkered if they imagined this continuing off into the future if they intend to make the same kinds of games. Small one-and-done games are being brought on solely to bulk GP's current library, to swell a value proposition needed in the early phase - they're not going to be an important part of what the service is down the line. Same as when platformholders lean on Indies in early years of a platform only to go cold on them when they no longer have that use, don't be surprised to see thistory repeat here. That kind of game just isn't a long term, sustainable part of what gamepass is going to be all about. It's real future is a multitude of twists on the GaaS model with a guaranteed flat subscription fee for xbox and a series of platforms upon a platform with masses of potential to take in $s beyond the previous $60 retail game in a box.
Sony has 150 million something userbase they aren't going bankrupt.Nintendo and Sony would go bankrupt if they offered this, only reasons is sustainable for Xbox is because they have MS.
It's also the reason they can invest Netflix-like money despite having a fraction of their user base.
They wouldnt go bankrupt lol - they would just make much less money then they are right now.Nintendo and Sony would go bankrupt if they offered this, only reasons is sustainable for Xbox is because they have MS.
It's also the reason they can invest Netflix-like money despite having a fraction of their user base.
I like a big variety of games. Don't get me wrong there are some games on gamepass that I would like or have already played and enjoyed. However I have a pc, PS4 pro and a switch and there is nothing on gamepass that is having my attention at the moment.
I have had gamepass pc since near launch and have played:
gears of War 1, enjoyed but didn't feel in a rush to play another one.
banner saga 1&2 (enjoyed),
Outer worlds, enjoyed but found it a bit lightweight
Vampyr - was enjoying but the game left gamepass before I finished it,
Plague tale - kind of enjoyed but clearly haven't found it very compelling as I haven't been back to it for a long time
So I am not getting good value and should probably drop it. The price is low enough that I haven't bothered to yet!
MS/Xbox crew dropped the ball on the messaging and the showing was definitely not one that got people screaming "fuck, i need a Series X at release!"
tbh, all this "Gamepass woohoo!" stuff is annoying at this point. there are first party games on it that don´t materialize for the next years, the other stuff is third party, mostly later than the normal release. also, there are games that many people have already bought and a bunch of indie games which is cool but many people don´t care about that.
Care to provide examples?
The idea of playing BotW on a TV, and then undocking it and continuing to play it, and playing Halo Infinite on your Xbox, and then booting it up on your tablet through Xcloud is the same. Just different means to get to the same outcome.
I wouldn't be surprised if there's a learning period of course.
They wouldnt go bankrupt lol - they would just make much less money then they are right now.
So there is no incentive - MS offers GamePass because their first party sales were lackluster and the games didnt sell consoles, so they had to come through with a strong service to convince outsiders to jump in.
Hmm Netflix changed from DVDs yes, but it's a low investment. It takes nothing to sit and watch television or movies. It's much different playing video games. It's not something people just do on the go like that especially if the hardware isn't specifically built for that function. This isn't about the cloud either...I just don't think it will be normalized the way Microsoft see it. It's a big investment tho. We'll see
my "problem" with game pass is that games are very time intensive and as an adult i'd rather play what i want instead of chosing one of a selection that i get from a service like that.
The messaging for a year has been Microsoft doesn't care if you buy a Series X.
Just buy game pass.
The presentation was bad for Series X but all of those games on that service is far more impressive than anything else.
So much of this forum continues to miss the point and I can understand why.
Oh i agree - seems like many GamePass subs cant understand that other players might be just be happy with what is being provided on other plattforms. Its like a Netflix sub getting mad about people still watching new releases in the Theater or also having a HBO/Disney+ subscription.bankurpcy was a hyperbole, yeah, but the point is Sony wouldn't gamble with their most profitable branch when there's no need to. PS users aren't fucking jealous of game pass, that's for sure.
To me, this is what they are going for. It doesn't matter if they release games every month that someone wants to play, as long as they release them "early enough" before someone finally realizes that spending money for nothing isn't really worth it. Doesn't matter how cheap it is if you aren't using it. It seems like some have never rented a game in their life or something, and see this as revolutionary.
A great point
I hope gamepass is the model going forward
i would NOT want to pay 60(70?)$ for b-grade titles from sony like days gone, tsushina or ratchet... they should be included in a sub.
Sony tried this with PSNOW putting it on everything known to man and it didn't work. Google Stadia is having a hard time right now and curation is not it's problem. It showed how you can do it for YouTube which is the top video service in the world but I don't think people are jived with the idea of playing video games from those devices yet.
BOTW is not running off the cloud and is on a physical console that is designed to dock on or off. It is not your smartphone that has many of different functions in which adding playing a video game requires an additional accessory. I'm not sure whats hard to get.
Xcloud is positioning itself as a play anywhere thing...but since this has been tried before, are people going to invest in that way to play. For Xbox gamers, I doubt that most people will play games like that themselves. This forum be damned but this will tire out just like the other attempts. I'll eat crow if it's widely adopted but it's not normalized right now and I doubt it will be in the future. It just aesthetically looks different and that will be the hurdle. Luckily for them, it's apart of the service so it get to pass the metric without an additional cost.
obviously, i'm just saying that it has no value for me right now.
A great point
I hope gamepass is the model going forward
i would NOT want to pay 60(70?)$ for b-grade titles from sony like days gone, tsushina or ratchet... they should be included in a sub.
Ghost of Tsushima and Ratchet are b grade now????
These threads are wild man
Just you wait. Gamepass will lead to the death of single player experiences...any day now.
You are trying to show growth from the Netflix then to the Netflix now to point similarities into how xcloud will be adopted. It's not the same. Whether it's gibberish or not will be determined by the future. Bye.
What a terrible takeA great point
I hope gamepass is the model going forward
i would NOT want to pay 60(70?)$ for b-grade titles from sony like days gone, tsushina or ratchet... they should be included in a sub.
It will, they just won't be 40 hour single player games. Probably just 10 hour single player games and that's ok because that means no bloatI always thought that mindset was odd. Honestly I'd think gamepass would encourage more single player games sense Microsoft could make them profitable day one instead of hoping that enough people buy the game with no extra revenue streams.
If Halo is an indication, it seems to be cheapening the quality of their tentpole AAA titles.
Is it though or is it difficult to keep up population numbers on a brand new comeptive shooter on a console that will probably cost $500If Halo is an indication, it seems to be cheapening the quality of their tentpole AAA titles.
Has been the case for a while already, so thats gonna to continue.Guess Gamepass will be the bailout excuse everytime MS has a poor showing.
I doubt you get games on the level of Sony first party with single player focus with such a subscription service - TLOU 2 might alone sell 20m copies. How much money does MS make per year with GamePass ? Just because it works for MS and their more service games oriented approach doesnt mean its gonna work out the same for every publisher.So you would PREFER to pay for every single ps5 exclusive? You DONT want the option to get them in a subscription?
is that what you are saying
if that is the case - just listen to Alanah
Resogun was ass.... what? You probably meant KZIs it though or is it difficult to keep up population numbers on a brand new comeptive shooter on a console that will probably cost $500
Plus launch games are usually ass (Ryse, Resogun). Look pretty but ass
If Halo is an indication, it seems to be cheapening the quality of their tentpole AAA titles.
Is it though or is it difficult to keep up population numbers on a brand new comeptive shooter on a console that will probably cost $500
Plus launch games are usually ass (Ryse, Resogun). Look pretty but ass
There wasn't much to grab from my launch PS4, should I have said Dont Starve or DC Online.Comparing Ryse to Resogun is like comparing The Order 1886 to Geometry Wars, it's a really weird comparison.
The messaging for a year has been Microsoft doesn't care if you buy a Series X.
Just buy game pass.
The presentation was bad for Series X but all of those games on that service is far more impressive than anything else.
So much of this forum continues to miss the point and I can understand why.
The show marketing was all about Halo. On the pre show people said Halo every few minutes.
Sure gamepass is awesome, but the main course of the show was Halo, there is no denying that.