As someone who didn't really care about the original Aladdin, I came out smiling and actually enjoying it.
I cared about the original Aladdin and loved this one too, but I have also been a Will Smith fan for like, my entire life.
As someone who didn't really care about the original Aladdin, I came out smiling and actually enjoying it.
Considering the audience's reception to the movie, nah this is far from mediocre.sorry no, it suffers from pacing problem as it rushes through the movies and as a brown skin person of colour. I feel that more effort could have gone into this movie than just making a mediocre movie.
It's true what they say, mediocre white male get the world handed to them while PoC have to work harder just to get a glimmer of a chance.
The pacing problems exist in the original too. I mean it taks place in the span of a week. After Jafar becomes Sultan he just lounges around on Agrabah with nothing to do until Aladdin returns. Princess Jasmine falls in love with Aladdin in a couple of days and has no real depth to her character.I am sorry no, it suffers from pacing problem as it rushes through the movies and as a brown skin person of colour. I feel that more effort could have gone into this movie than just making a mediocre movie.
It's true what they say, mediocre white male get the world handed to them while PoC have to work harder just to get a glimmer of a chance.
Jafar is bad. I just thought he would be worse than worse, like distractingly terrible. My expectations were sub-zero. Having said that, having accepted that he would be this bad, I thought he was serviceable. Still horribly miscast, still woefully squandered in terms of potential, but not bad enough to rip me from the film.Well. It wasn't the trainwreck I thought it would be, especially after listening to the music beforehand.
It was decent, I had a fun time. Will Smith was better than I had thought (and feared after listening to Friend Like Me, which worked in the movie). A lot of it was awkward though, with pacing issues, and the signature Guy Ritchie SLOW MO DRAMATIC shots (me and my sister's husband burst out laughing at the loooooooooong slow mo scream as Aladdin fell off the balcony lmao).
However. Jafar was just flat out terrible. Like, I cannot understand how anyone looked at that performance and thought it was good, or fine, or acceptable, or even so bad it's good.
Zero menace, zero slimy charisma, zero personality. Like god, he just sat there while Jasmine Soapbox Speeched her way back into power. Everything about him, from his voice, his acting, even his outfit (his HAT WAS CROOKED THE WHOLE FILM), was just up and down awful.
Other than Jafar though, the rest was fine. Speechless is obviously done by a different song writer and sticks out like a sore thumb, but it's not a bad song. I laughed at it literally stopping the film though.
So....yeah. Better than I thought it would be.
Also, Abu and Carpet were cute AF.
Overall the movie was worth a watch, but Jafar was terrible as everyone points out. I was also equally disappointed how they murdered Iago's character. Gottfried's performance was really great in the original. Iago has so few lines in this one. I was not a fan of how the sultan was also changed to a more serious character. Smith did a decent job, and he nailed the scene wherePedrad was also a good addition.Aladdin sets him free.
It was more like A Whole New Section Just A Bit Down South of Agrabah.a whole new world lacked , egypt, china, and parts of europe right?
Yeah I actually expected a more fantastical magic carpet ride. Was especially surprised when they showed the shot of Aladdin in the polar regions.It was more like A Whole New Section Just A Bit Down South of Agrabah.
Jafar is bad. I just thought he would be worse than worse, like distractingly terrible. My expectations were sub-zero. Having said that, having accepted that he would be this bad, I thought he was serviceable. Still horribly miscast, still woefully squandered in terms of potential, but not bad enough to rip me from the film.
I say this as someone who thinks Jafar is the best villain in the Disney animated world. He sucked but it wasn't the show stopping performance I thought it would be.
If I didn't see any of the trailers or reveals before hand and knew nothing of the film, I would have been incredibly disappointed with him.
He was bad no doubt. I thought him and Aladdin were miscast though Aladdin did a better job.He was distractingly terrible for me. I was hoping from the trailers that they were just going for a more "quiet menace" or someone who seemed harmless before they went nuts. If that was their goal though, I thought they failed. He was just bad all around.
("Give me your hand!"
"How about my foot," he says with deadpan boredom.)
He was bad no doubt. I thought him and Aladdin were miscast though Aladdin did a better job.
IMO Aladdin is an equally disappointing component of the film. He is just so charming and endearing in the original. Aladdin in this movie just kinda stood around and let everybody else carry him.I was okay with Aladdin in the end. He was decently charming, had good chemistry with Will Smith and Naomi Scott, and was okay at singing. Made some dumb faces though haha.
But yeah....Jafar.......... 😔
My wife's been 3 times now and is itching to go again
I've been twice and could happily go for another viewing, really loved it and my 3 year old keeps singing Speechless
IMO Aladdin is an equally disappointing component of the film. He is just so charming and endearing in the original. Aladdin in this movie just kinda stood around and let everybody else carry him.
That said,
Best scene in the movie by far was Aladdin/genie arriving after the parade/Prince Ali song. I was dying
Yeah, I think they wrote him wrong to be fair. OG confident Aladdin is far better and makes for a more charismatic performance. I didn't hate him but he was definitely flat and IMO didn't have great chemistry with Jasmine, who really owned her role.Oh, live action Aladdin definitely isn't as charming as animated. Animated Aladdin is charismatic to a T.
LA Aladdin was fine enough though, he had a nice smile and when he was trying to be charming, he was charming. I feel it was more direction with him? Like they had him so NERVOUS half the film because he was a pretender, with awkward smiles and the "I'm LYING HAHAHA" kind of personality, whereas Animated Aladdin walked the walk and talked the talk because he could pull it off and knew he could. Animated Aladdin was just more sure of himself in his deception lol.
Yeah, I think they wrote him wrong to be fair. OG confident Aladdin is far better and makes for a more charismatic performance. I didn't hate him but he was definitely flat and IMO didn't have great chemistry with Jasmine, who really owned her role.
Speaking of which, I really lovedthe change to her storyline to want to become Sultan. I loved a lot of the changes to her character!
The only thing I didn't like is how they doubled down on her buying Aladdin's lie, I never thought her character would believe it, even in the original. Though they at least showed some doubt on her face at leastYes! I forgot to mention that in my initial post. I really appreciated what the film did for Jasmine.
The new interpretation feels more organic imo. Most people probably won't be able to pull off such a 180 in converting from a poor thief to a rich prince over night and knowing exactly how to pull it off. It didn't feel as earned in the original.Oh, live action Aladdin definitely isn't as charming as animated. Animated Aladdin is charismatic to a T.
LA Aladdin was fine enough though, he had a nice smile and when he was trying to be charming, he was charming. I feel it was more direction with him? Like they had him so NERVOUS half the film because he was a pretender, with awkward smiles and the "I'm LYING HAHAHA" kind of personality, whereas Animated Aladdin walked the walk and talked the talk because he could pull it off and knew he could. Animated Aladdin was just more sure of himself in his deception lol.
The original sequel was direct to VHS and wasn't even well received. I think it's the least of their worries here.Iago really pissed me off. It's especially odd given how theyset up the sequel, with Jafar trapping Iago in the lamp with him. Iago was a huge part of Return of Jafar, and this just won't work. Unless they said Jafar granted Iago a voice so he had someone to talk with in the lamp, lol.
They put emphasis on that scene for a reason. Genie and even Dalia are like "she really bought that??" and the latter even tells that to Jasmine's face. It's evident from her reaction that she puts more belief in the lie because she wishes it were true. Akin to a confirmation bias.The only thing I didn't like is how they doubled down on her buying Aladdin's lie, I never thought her character would believe it, even in the original. Though they at least showed some doubt on her face at least
The new interpretation feels more organic imo. Most people probably won't be able to pull off such a 180 in converting from a poor thief to a rich prince over night and knowing exactly how to pull it off. It didn't feel as earned in the original.
The original sequel was direct to VHS and wasn't even well received. I think it's the least of their worries here.
They put emphasis on that scene for a reason. Genie and even Dalia are like "she really bought that??" and the latter even tells that to Jasmine's face. It's evident from her reaction that she puts more belief in the lie because she wishes it were true. Akin to a confirmation bias.
He had less character, but he did more than serve as "Jafar's number one cheerleader" which I liked. His role was pivotal in several acts of the movie. But yeah, they took a bit too much away from the original incarnation.It was received well enough to warrant a third movie. Regardless, Iago should have been given more character. This coming from someone who enjoyed the new film enough to bring the kids to see it three times.
Was it established that the
Genie lost all his powers?
How is a sequel even going to be possible.
Thing is, I think Jafar is such a massive part of the story and such a hugely effective character in the original that this film completely limps from scene to scene as he is here. He's the engine of conflict for the plot and he needs that presence and charisma.Well. It wasn't the trainwreck I thought it would be, especially after listening to the music beforehand.
It was decent, I had a fun time. Will Smith was better than I had thought (and feared after listening to Friend Like Me, which worked in the movie). A lot of it was awkward though, with pacing issues, and the signature Guy Ritchie SLOW MO DRAMATIC shots (me and my sister's husband burst out laughing at the loooooooooong slow mo scream as Aladdin fell off the balcony lmao).
However. Jafar was just flat out terrible. Like, I cannot understand how anyone looked at that performance and thought it was good, or fine, or acceptable, or even so bad it's good.
Zero menace, zero slimy charisma, zero personality. Like god, he just sat there while Jasmine Soapbox Speeched her way back into power. Everything about him, from his voice, his acting, even his outfit (his HAT WAS CROOKED THE WHOLE FILM), was just up and down awful.
Other than Jafar though, the rest was fine. Speechless is obviously done by a different song writer and sticks out like a sore thumb, but it's not a bad song. I laughed at it literally stopping the film though.
So....yeah. Better than I thought it would be.
Also, Abu and Carpet were cute AF.
The only thing I didn't like is how they doubled down on her buying Aladdin's lie, I never thought her character would believe it, even in the original. Though they at least showed some doubt on her face at least
But she was really great, and she actually sings her songs it looks like!
The new interpretation feels more organic imo. Most people probably won't be able to pull off such a 180 in converting from a poor thief to a rich prince over night and knowing exactly how to pull it off. It didn't feel as earned in the original.
Thing is, I think Jafar is such a massive part of the story and such a hugely effective character in the original that this film completely limps from scene to scene as he is here. He's the engine of conflict for the plot and he needs that presence and charisma.
Honestly, Jafar is easily the second best character after Genie in the 92 version and no other characters in this film are stepping up to fill the void.
This movie really drags before we get to Will Smith. All of Jafar's scenes now being longer but less interesting are dragging it down.
That's fair. But it's kinda back and forth even in the original. He goes from poor boy to professional royal to the exact opposite of a charmer and needing Genie's advice when he meets with Jasmine 1 on 1. Much more back and forth without much in between or more organic growth in his behavior.I agree with below that it was more of a confirmation bias thing. She just wanted it to be true.
She does sing! She's pretty good.
I guess I enjoy endlessly charming grifter Aladdin more haha. Aladdin is one of my fave Disney princes because he's such a charmer, so I guess I'm biased. But he's slick and I think that's the point in the animated film haha.
Iago was too much of a plot crutch for me to like this version. Every single secret is pretty much discovered because of him. Original was way more funny with Gottfried's voice.He had less character, but he did more than serve as "Jafar's number one cheerleader" which I liked. His role was pivotal in several acts of the movie. But yeah, they took a bit too much away from the original incarnation.
I wish the fan backlash with this move wasn't so much.
I watched it with very low expectations and it ended up being pretty good. I really liked all the leads. Will Smith was great, mena and Naomi were great too.
I actually hope we get a sequel.
Same thing as with Venom, people were out for blood, then when people actually watched it, the majority of posters begrudingly admitted they enjoyed it.I mean all the negativity before the movie released. That's why I avoided it till now.