Bad coverage has been in the minority as far as I've seen. Most that I've read has been appropriately harsh and incredulous of THQ's attempted apology. Some of them should arguably update or post a new article as they may have missed some relevant info or context, like Pollice's response to the homophobic image for instance. Others have done a perfectly good job. And then there's Gamespot...where THQ's false apology was half the article, which failed to mention 80% of the relevant information. That's like, actively terrible.
The worst I've seen is Gamereactor.se. Don't know how relevant they are in the grand scheme. Still, I want to go on record.
Beyond uncritically quoting THQ's apology, letting that be the narrative, and failing to mention any other relevant information, their article said something like "this controversy overshadowed the fact that some interesting information was actually revealed during this AMA" and then proceeded to list these vague nothings of "we're doing things maybe". Like...jsesusfucking christ, this guy is leaping from this, straight into doing marketing for the company. He thought regurgitating shallow PR lines was of the same importance, deserved as much attention as this shitshow, and figured it was more relevant than what he omitted. The fuck is wrong with him? Reading that made me actually angry. What a fucking incompetent asshole.
Anyway, I reckon games media's responsibility going forward is to not let this blow over. The same as it is ours. Just people and society in general, really.
I don't think it matters when a site declares they're taking some action in the general direction of applying pressure to THQ, what matters is that they do it.
Whether it's continued coverage of this issue, ceasing coverage of THQ games, applying disclaimers to it, or whatever else.
See Game Informer, Game Revolution
The worst I've seen is Gamereactor.se. Don't know how relevant they are in the grand scheme. Still, I want to go on record.
Beyond uncritically quoting THQ's apology, letting that be the narrative, and failing to mention any other relevant information, their article said something like "this controversy overshadowed the fact that some interesting information was actually revealed during this AMA" and then proceeded to list these vague nothings of "we're doing things maybe". Like...jsesusfucking christ, this guy is leaping from this, straight into doing marketing for the company. He thought regurgitating shallow PR lines was of the same importance, deserved as much attention as this shitshow, and figured it was more relevant than what he omitted. The fuck is wrong with him? Reading that made me actually angry. What a fucking incompetent asshole.
Anyway, I reckon games media's responsibility going forward is to not let this blow over. The same as it is ours. Just people and society in general, really.
I don't think it matters when a site declares they're taking some action in the general direction of applying pressure to THQ, what matters is that they do it.
Whether it's continued coverage of this issue, ceasing coverage of THQ games, applying disclaimers to it, or whatever else.
It's because you can't make much talk if THQ doesn't respond to anything. Unless you go for a direct call to action for business partners to demand details and actions, there's not much you can report on.
Whether THQ responds to requests for comments or not, you don't need THQ's permission as it were, to talk about and around this situation.it has gone relatively quiet yeah because there's not much else to cover. THQ N are keeping quiet.
See Game Informer, Game Revolution