When has the press in general ever taken a stand for anything by withholding coverage? In pretty much any example. Do you think the entertainment press should stop covering Skydance Animation productions?
What's Skydance Animation productions ?
When has the press in general ever taken a stand for anything by withholding coverage? In pretty much any example. Do you think the entertainment press should stop covering Skydance Animation productions?
Not yet, since I dont think there's a relevant actual information about an upcoming game. Did THQN released a press release or new media about an upcoming game ?
But can you name some examples of the press who came out and say "we wont cover them until actions are taken" ?
What's the point of having a discussion if you're just going to be angry and emotional without reading what other people are trying to say? :(
So the whole premise of your thread is based on what if's... I think most outlets have in some shape or form been very vocal against THQN.
What's the point of having a discussion if you're just going to be angry and emotional without reading what other people are trying to say? :(
I mentioned it specifically in my previous post, haha! Right after Polanski. I specifically mentioned it because it's an example of a current problem in the entertainment space outside of gaming, for a direct comparison. Lots of problematic things around us!But I'm reading ! :o
Hence why I'm asking what's Skydance Animation production. You're asking me should they stop covering them without telling me who are they. But yeah, after proper research, I think so, the press should stop covering them.
I don't check a ton of gaming sites but i feel like I heard the THQ thing be brought up a number of times the last week. They did their job of reporting the news and they will likely report further if more comes to light. Sites will have their own internal politics on whether or not to continue coverage or advertising with the company but it's up to the reader/viewer/listener to come to their own opinion on the ordeal. Your asking these site to create internet mobs which is not their job and a toxic practice.
Can you please point to those outlets please? I haven't seen any of them do such thing.So the whole premise of your thread is based on what if's... I think most outlets have in some shape or form been very vocal against THQN.
I mentioned it specifically in my previous post, haha! Right after Polanski. I specifically mentioned it because it's an example of a current problem in the entertainment space outside of gaming, for a direct comparison. Lots of problematic things around us!
Can you please point to those outlets please? I haven't seen any of them do such thing.
It's not a what if. I haven't heard of any publication saying "We stop covering them until action is taken". While your argument is based on the fact that the reason their games haven't been covered for now is that... well, there was nothing to cover.
Can you name some examples of press who have covered THQN games after this scandal happened?
So if there is nothing to cover how much of a threat is it actually to come out and say you won't cover games from them. The press have been very vocal against THQ. Their stance have been clearly against THQ. Coming out and saying that they won't cover, something that isn't there right now, is a nothing threat and hollow.
I get that it's the in thing to do to shit on the gaming media, but unlike most of "real hardcore gamers" on YouTube the press have actually been vocal against THQ. Now if you see a site covering a thqN gmbh game in the future you can go find your pitchfork.
Can you please point to those outlets please? I haven't seen any of them do such thing.
But if we look at how things that blow up become big, it's often not because the press kept covering it. It's because people cared about the coverage and pushed for it to matter by more people coming forward and making a big deal about it.Welp, shit, my bad ><
It is a problem outside of gaming, on the other hand well.. we also see how outside of gaming that kind of stuff became big. It's not to say press coverage outside of gaming for that kind of issue is perfect. It's not. But it actually feels like a lot of publications are actually trying to push things while in the gaming industry well... it tends to remains soft.
I didn't even knew that 8chan existed before this, and i would probably still don't know about it if some press coverage hadn't been made.
So it would probably have been better to not have a coverage at all on the matter.
It's called pressuring until actions are taken.
How's their stance clear ? Did they state that they're going to keep coverage or not ?
This is a really great point. As much as I have anger over the whole thing, I can't really sit down and write out a piece that puts that anger in a way that will articulate that out to people and say why this is a truly horrible thing and not something that people should shrug their shoulders at or let them sweep it under the rug.Many outlets do not have good opinion pieces authors. Mostly reviewers or news reporters that can't really write anything good when it comes to non-review opinion piece.
Kotaku writes something good from time to time and... I can't really think of anyone else. Eurogamer maybe, once a year.
It's called pressuring until actions are taken.
How's their stance clear ? Did they state that they're going to keep coverage or not ?
polygon, IGN, Eurogamer, PC gamer, kotaku....they all talked about it and said it was very bad thing for THQN to do
My apologies then. It just seem like it went all quiet since the incident happened. The only place I noticed that has kept it alive has been ERA.See podge reply. And we covered it on our latest podcast. And giant bomb covered it on both beast and bombast
It's because you can't make much talk if THQ doesn't respond to anything. Unless you go for a direct call to action for business partners to demand details and actions, there's not much you can report on.My apologies then. It just seem like it went all quiet since the incident happened. The only place I noticed that has kept it alive has been ERA.
My apologies then. It just seem like it went all quiet since the incident happened. The only place I noticed that has kept it alive has been ERA.
But if we look at how things that blow up become big, it's often not because the press kept covering it. It's because people cared about the coverage and pushed for it to matter by more people coming forward and making a big deal about it.
#MeToo was not a big deal because the press made it a big deal. It was a big deal because a segment of society said enough was enough and made it matter. The press then continued covering it as it blew up, helping highlight how the issue was expanding. There's an example of this happening in gaming too - look at Riot Games. That was a pretty big deal that blew up. There was press coverage and also increasingly more people coming out and talking about it from inside the company. Activision Blizzard's recent redundancies? Same thing.
So why isn't this THQ Nordic thing blowing up right now? Probably because the people who work at or under THQ Nordic mostly don't feel it's big enough of a deal to take a stand and speak against it, and since it doesn't affect their own jobs or any specific victims anyone can put a name or face to, it's hard for them to care personally. The gaming audience also mostly doesn't care, but that's nothing new. Hard to care about moral issues when you just wanna play some shootbangs. So it's kinda unfair to pin it entirely on the press. They did do their jobs. There's always room for improvement but maybe we should take a look around ourselves and see the sort of company we keep in gaming communities, before assuming that the press has some magical power to make people care about stuff they don't care about.
But what happens if THQN before their next game comes out releases a full apology, fires the people who fucked up and announces plans to completely change their PR strategy?
Do you want the media to then take back the initial stance?
Any site declaring now they aren't going to cover THQN games is just a nothing statement
How is that a pressure when they dont have anything they currently want us to cover??? Its a nothing threat.
While your intentions are good this is a rather complicated stick to beat the gaming press with (who get a lot of unwarrented abuse). A lot of websites went in hard on THQ after this.
The articles I saw all were at pains to explain how this almost certainly wasn't a honest mistake and laid out good evidence to explain this. That is good journalism. Not just reporting but doing the extra work to close down half arsed apologists who will no doubt turn up in the comments.
You can ask for blanket no coverage but THQ Nordic owns a lot of studios, a few of them came out in the wake of this (or were approached by press) to express their disgust. A lot of those people aren't in anyway involved in this. It could easily be possible for this to spin out of control and innocent devs be targeted by the angry gaming mob. It has plenty of precedent.
Also coverage of games is not inherently positive. Just because a site is covering a game does not mean they are getting free advertisement for it. The recent Darksiders got a very lukewarm reception. Apparently it still sold well but no way the review coverage helped in that.
It's because you can't make much talk if THQ doesn't respond to anything. Unless you go for a direct call to action for business partners to demand details and actions, there's not much you can report on.
Fair enoughit has gone relatively quiet yeah because there's not much else to cover. THQ N are keeping quiet.
While your intentions are good this is a rather complicated stick to beat the gaming press with (who get a lot of unwarrented abuse). A lot of websites went in hard on THQ after this.
The articles I saw all were at pains to explain how this almost certainly wasn't a honest mistake and laid out good evidence to explain this. That is good journalism. Not just reporting but doing the extra work to close down half arsed apologists who will no doubt turn up in the comments.
You can ask for blanket no coverage but THQ Nordic owns a lot of studios, a few of them came out in the wake of this (or were approached by press) to express their disgust. A lot of those people aren't in anyway involved in this. It could easily be possible for this to spin out of control and innocent devs be targeted by the angry gaming mob. It has plenty of precedent.
Also coverage of games is not inherently positive. Just because a site is covering a game does not mean they are getting free advertisement for it. The recent Darksiders got a very lukewarm reception. Apparently it still sold well but no way the review coverage helped in that.
Except it doesnt because it doesnt impact THQN at all because they wouldnt have released anything to be boycotted???
Well, if they fired the people responsible of this mess and apologized, yes, it would be. Since it means they would've taken actions after that. It does impact THQN since it means the threat made them take actions.
I'm sure they had things planned that they've pulled because they are in hiding
I dunno, I think it's perfectly reasonable to draw the line at companies essentially endorsing child abuse.Surprised this is the straw that broke the camel's back for you. The gaming press never served as a check on the industry, in my opinion. It's a clique of individuals that are looking to progress their career and ensure they can keep eating, which is whatever.
Surprised this is the straw that broke the camel's back for you. The gaming press never served as a check on the industry, in my opinion. It's a clique of individuals that are looking to progress their career and ensure they can keep eating, which is whatever.
weird because the gaming sites that i inhabit took the whole thqn thing pretty seriously. tbh this just reads as an opportunity to pivot to "fuck the press" which hmmm seems a bit "ethics in games journalism"-ish.........
just saying.
What a stupid topic. The press is here to report on news. I saw a ton of reports on this, and a bunch of them called THQ out. There are more than a few opinion pieces too (which are not the responsibility of the press, remember). Trying to wring out more than an apology from a large company is pointless. What are you waiting for them to do? Drag the guy responsible out into the street and shoot him? When is your thirst filled here, OP?
Go on, say it. But you better be fuckin solid here if you're going to throw that kind of accusations.
oh im quite clear on what im saying. i saw multiple outlets cover thqn and listened to them talk about it in podcasts too. what im seeing now is people pivoting to bashing the press because they think it wasnt covered enough and think that proves collusion or lack of care by the press. i think that this is not unsimilar to gg tactics.
I'm just saying that it's hypocrite to call out on a company to then promote it.
Naive, the coverage on killers can wildly vary depending on their nationality.That too.
Basically the only safe media is when they talk about killers. One day we'll find out they also do that business
Congratulations, I don't think anyone could possible come up with a more annoying or obtuse take than this. I think we can pretty much wrap things up.Reddit and facebook also host a wide variety of horrible content and nobody bats an eye when companies host amas there.
So, you're accusing me to be a gamergater then ?
Because I'm quite clear myself here. I never said this wasn't covered. I said it wasn't covered enough. It sounds pretty big. And yet it doesn't get the coverage nor the answer it should get from the major publications. Yes, there are a few outlets or writers that actually did their job (which I highlighted). Now if you're accusing me of something, make it clear and loud. But as I said, you better have something fucking solid here.