Russian Civil War 2.0: Now With Nukes! is everyone's doomsday scenario.
no, vietnam was supposed to have an election after the french withdraw and the U.S. came in and installed their own puppet to fuck shit up. Even before that the U.S was footing the French bill in the fight in the NorthN. Korea attacked S. Korea, N. Vietnam attacked S. Vietnam, Iraq attacked Kuwait, Afghanistan harbored terrorists but yeah the US was the destabilizing force.
Not immediately. Over time, if Russia is crippled enough, possibly.
Stickies get ignored. There should be a stealth sticky that sticks but not In the sticky zone.They're everywhere and cheers to the ban.
I'd say it's time to sticky the thread up top, if you ask me.
Not at this point it's already happening.
For the time being, I'm not really going by anything that isn't being picked up and confirmed by news orgs. That's still susceptible to error, but there's at least some rigor there in trying to source or confirm the information.Yeah maybe we should have ways of vetting before posting social media posts.
And very much worse because this is a proverbial active shooter scenario across vast stretches of territory and hundreds of thousands of combatants mixed alongside millions of innocent people.It's like after a mass shooting a ton of dubious stuff is being posted
It's already happened.
N. Korea attacked S. Korea, N. Vietnam attacked S. Vietnam, Iraq attacked Kuwait, Afghanistan harbored terrorists but yeah the US was the destabilizing force.
N. Korea attacked S. Korea, N. Vietnam attacked S. Vietnam, Iraq attacked Kuwait, Afghanistan harbored terrorists but yeah the US was the destabilizing force.
Great thread derailment my friendN. Korea attacked S. Korea, N. Vietnam attacked S. Vietnam, Iraq attacked Kuwait, Afghanistan harbored terrorists but yeah the US was the destabilizing force.
Not trying to go off topic anymore, but not saying the US should attack or start war with Russia. I'm saying they should have stationed in Ukraine and therefore prevented it. I think the WW3 fearmongering cannot dictate every foreign policy decision in the nuclear weapon age. It doesn't affect the NATO countries commitment to defend against even a nuclear power and there's no reason why a signed document needed to prevent it here.
Stickies get ignored. There should be a stealth sticky that sticks but not In the sticky zone.
It's pretty crazy that the entire world is against this and the only people for it are Putin and the GOP.
Yeah I mentioned this in the last thread. Russia cannot afford to be like US/NATO when it comes to advance weapons. You are going to instead see more indiscriminate, high explosive artillery barrages followed by armor. They also have thermobaric weapons as well that are just pure terror weapons.
No, but if they cut SWIFT, do an energy embargo, restrict hi-tech exports to Russia and cut all tech support to all foreign software in Russia, then maybe in 4-5 years we'll have a chance of this not happening again.
Is it too much to ask users to not post memes, gifs or reaction images in this thread?
And very much worse because this is a proverbial active shooter scenario across vast stretches of territory and hundreds of thousands of combatants mixed alongside millions of innocent people.
That's a lot for a maybe :(No, but if they cut SWIFT, do an energy embargo, restrict hi-tech exports to Russia and cut all tech support to all foreign software in Russia, then maybe in 4-5 years we'll have a chance of this not happening again.
They're everywhere and cheers to the ban.
I'd say it's time to sticky the thread up top, if you ask me.
I also think when Zelenskyy more or less shut the door on any type of diplomatic solution with Russia last year and signaled that they would continue to be hostile and did this, Putin took it personal. Might even be why we are seeing the "Z" painted on vehicles.
Quoting my own post from the other thread-
I agree that the Iraq War comparison is apt which makes this invasion all the more baffling. There is no way Russia comes out of this not completely crippled.It took the coalition 2.5 weeks to take Baghdad. Ukraine is going to be more of a threat than Iraq, I'd imagine, and Russia not nearly as capable. So I would bet on something very bloody and protracted, as Russia tries attrition via air supremacy.
Wholeheartedly agree, we do not have to capacity to factcheck random tweets.I dont' think we should post tweets at all unless its from some news organization. The potential to spiral into misinformation is already happening.
It took the coalition 2.5 weeks to take Baghdad. Ukraine is going to be more of a threat than Iraq, I'd imagine, and Russia not nearly as capable. So I would bet on something very bloody and protracted, as Russia tries attrition via air supremacy.
I think the thread will stay on the first page due to sheer amount of commentary
Literally 3 messages later lmao
The DSA? What is going on?I wish it was just on the right. The fucking DSA was doing propaganda for them.
I don't see anyone talking about communism outside of China anymore. I was referring to how many of the boomer generation should remember the imminent and unceasing threat of nuclear war with an antagonistic power. Whether it's communism or capitalistic is unimportant. The major corporations are in bed with the government either way.In terms of ideological solidarity, the right-wing Putin supporters are the least confused ones! People find it convenient to say Putin wants the "Soviet Union back", which is true in a sense (he wants a larger Russian empire) but deliberately misleading, implying that Putin is a communist.