I disagree. Every year of something is too much. I think the fact sports games get away with it (and don't just release roster updates) is one of the biggest scams in multimedia.
One and done.No, no it's not. A year without one is a really good thing in my opinion. I'd rather them take some time off from all the yearly shit..
This. It's not sad waiting for a game, it's exciting waiting for a quality productNo, no it's not. A year without one is a really good thing in my opinion. I'd rather them take some time off from all the yearly shit..
I only started Odyssey and I also got the season pass and I can easily tell that this game will take me MONTHS to complete..just absurd amount of content there.
But I stated it late so I guess I'm not a good example.
Honestly, AC needs a long break, & more than a year. It's suffering from franchise fatigue within many people because of releasing a game annually almost each & every damn year.
The only memorable AC games so far, are the Ezio Trilogy (Assassin's Creed II, Brotherhood & Revelations). And that's because they were very well thought out & spaced out in between.
I purchased the DLC and was sorry I did. It's the same game just a lot more grindy (if that can be believed). I played a few hours and gave up. After >130hrs in the main game I'd had enough.I just finished the main story of Odyssey after about 170 hours, I still have the Atlantis DLC to go through. I'm gonna miss Kassandra after it's all over :(
The break is good though, I can't handle another monster game like that for a couple of months
yearly franchises are the worst.
let it breath, give it a chance to really innovate
^
Yearly franchises suck. Put some more thought into it, give it time.
Give me 3 year game developments that give us quality games. I don't need more games that I've played before.
Maybe then I'll start paying £50 at launch.