These fucking hacks. This is downright laughable.To further fuel the fire: I received a code for Control UE on PlayStation 4. I own the base game + season pass. I went to redeem the new code and it says I already own the game.
These fucking hacks. This is downright laughable.To further fuel the fire: I received a code for Control UE on PlayStation 4. I own the base game + season pass. I went to redeem the new code and it says I already own the game.
Check the threadmarks. We've got a long list of gaming press covering it.I guess there was never a big media backlash from this? Too bad
Why would you think Remedy would want to do the free upgrade? Remedy is a public company, owns this IP, and financially invested a significant amount of their funds in developing the game which likely enabled them to negotiate a publishing deal where they get a percentage of the profits. It's much safer to think they have no issue with this decision their publisher, who they chose, made that's intended to generate more revenue they would likely financially benefit from until proven otherwise.
This has got to mean 505 Games is making some changes, right? How could they enforce their rule if PSN understands the UE and the base + single pass as being the same thing? I suppose the only way to do this is if both versions of the game were different SKUs, which this seems to suggest they're not.
We don't know is my point however you would rather create a hypothetical where Remedy is some small, desperate developer with no track record and gets every benefit of the doubt where the details we do know makes it highly unlikely and they likely had some options and leverage in negotiations. Regardless, it's one thing to think Remedy had no say in this decision their publisher made, however it's another thing to think Remedy would somehow be against this decision and if given the choice they would have chosen the free upgrade option to everybody based on nothing but because, I'm assuming, you like them as a developer.What if they didn't have much choice but to chose 505 games and any terms they offered? They are hardly the first publisher you think of to publish a game like Control.
From the way I look at it the PR damage for Remedy seems hardly worth it to sell an edition for a game that, let's face it, hardly set the sales chart on fire and I see no reason to think it is going to sell any better on the rerelease.
We don't know is my point however you would rather create a hypothetical where Remedy is some small, desperate developer with no track record and gets every benefit of the doubt where the details we do know makes it highly unlikely and they likely had some options and leverage in negotiations. Regardless, it's one thing to think Remedy had no say in this decision their publisher made, however it's another thing to think Remedy would somehow be against this decision and if given the choice they would have chosen the free upgrade option to everybody based on nothing but because, I'm assuming, you like them as a developer.
My issue specifically was you saying:But wasn't my original point was for people to keep in mind this is very likely a publisher decision, so don't automatically rage at Remedy who probably has little say even if they own the IP because they don't own the publishing rights.
On the balance of probabilities this is probably 505's call, with them being the publisher, so it's them people should be complaining to if it is going to be anyone.
Hence me replying with:I would think Remedy would want to do the free upgrade, so people should keep this in mind rather than raging at Remedy.
and initiating this dialogue with youWhy would you think Remedy would want to do the free upgrade? Remedy is a public company, owns this IP, and financially invested a significant amount of their funds in developing the game which likely enabled them to negotiate a publishing deal where they get a percentage of the profits. It's much safer to think they have no issue with this decision their publisher, who they chose, made that's intended to generate more revenue they would likely financially benefit from until proven otherwise.
Arguing if Remedy has a say, if any, in any of the publishing decisions is one thing but believing Remedy's hands are completely clean of this issue or that they would be against this decision as a public company that likely financially benefits from this decision intended to generate more revenue based on nothing but simply giving them the benefit of the doubt because people like them as a developer is another.Absent other evidence, the only sensible conclusion is that the publisher is responsible for publishing decisions. It's kind of the whole reason they exist.
Did your read what I wrote? Occam's Razor tells me Remedy's hands aren't completely clean of this situation, as much as people want to believe so, until I'm shown otherwise. They're not getting let off the hook that easy.Occam's. Razor. If you think Remedy is at fault, bring some proof.
Did your read what I wrote? Occam's Razor tells me Remedy hand's aren't completely clean of this situation as much as people want to believe so until I'm shown otherwise.
Oh I understand the situation and it's highly unlikely they can show otherwise, but it's not enough for me to give them the benefit of the doubt either knowing what we know so far. People keep viewing this through a binary lens between the 2 extremes of the all powerful, money hungry, evil publisher and the all passionate, artistic integrity, good developer with no subtlety or nuance in-between especially given what we do know.Shown what exactly? Remedy themselves can't openly go against their publisher, it's simply bad business and can damage potential future dealings with anybody else. They might even have some contractual obligations to stay quiet during situations like that.
As far as power dynamic is concerned, usually if not always it's the dev that gets the short end of the stick.
This is a muddled question and accusation because we simply don't know how much - if any - leverage Remedy would have for the publisher's decisions. I remember speaking with someone from Netherrealm Studios once about some of the stuff that Warner Bros did that they just had to go along with if they wanted to do something they actually did want to do. It could've been a compromise between an even worse decision. Game development between developer and publisher can be messy, and whether a developer agrees with and supports their publisher or not isn't always something they are at liberty to discuss. And a "developer" is many moving parts, with many possibly disagreeing with other parts of the staff. Ultimately, we just don't know, but we DO know that 505 Games is the publisher with the higher responsibility to "publish" the game and likely the ones who made the final call.Oh I understand the situation and it's highly unlikely they can show otherwise, but it's not enough for me to give them the benefit of the doubt either knowing what we know so far. People keep viewing this through a binary lens between the 2 extremes of the all powerful, money hungry, evil publisher and the all passionate, artistic integrity, good developer with no subtlety or nuance in-between especially given what we do know.
To further fuel the fire: I received a code for Control UE on PlayStation 4. I own the base game + season pass. I went to redeem the new code and it says I already own the game.
Because it's rarely that simple, and I've spoken with enough developers over the years to know that publishers push back against a lot of developer wishes. I don't know Remedy's developers personally and I don't know what their pay structure is like. I know many developers might get a bonus for a certain amount of copies sold or hitting a certain critical reception, but most are already paid for the work they do and don't get substantial residuals from another copy of the game sold. These sort of tactics are more the kind of business decisions meant to appease shareholders and executives looking for short-term profit over long-term sustainability, and the way that Remedy talked about the game - particularly "good word-of-mouth" - as part of their plan for future Control support and support for future endeavors makes me feel that these business decisions run counter to what their intended goal was for branching out and building up a stronger community for bigger, better ventures.Why do people think Remedy is innocent? They're a company that would love for people to spend money twice. All devs would.
Adding it to the pile.Tried to include what we've learned but my article is live:
505 Games Is Triple Dipping with Control Ultimate Edition
vidaisonline Thomas Puha When yall going to adress this? Shits getting outta hand
I bought Control and the season pass ages ago, just platinumed it an finished both expansions. An amazing game, but I won't be buying shit from Remedy or 505 until they adress this.
Feels really shitty when I've bought every Remedy game there is and now I have to buy the Ultimate Edition even though I own the game and season pass which cost me more than just buying the Ultimate Edition. Really shitty.
It's possibly Remedy will never adress the situation as they might have little or even no say in the matter. And saying"it's all the publisher's fault" might be problematic. It would be cool to know more details about the interior of this awful decisions.
Initially they did but then they revoked accessWait, so 505 may have messed up so bad, us original owners may now own the ultimate edition anyway?
I can't check right now.
Ah, it's weird how they can do that if it's true Sony sees it as the same game.
I'm understanding the same. They're fucking amateurs my god !To me it sounds like 505 messed up so bad that even if someone WANTED to digitally buy the Ultimate Edition when they already had the base game + season pass, they can't, because PSN thinks it's the same game?
To further fuel the fire: I received a code for Control UE on PlayStation 4. I own the base game + season pass. I went to redeem the new code and it says I already own the game.
Nice article. I hope other outlets cite you when they eventually pick this up.Tried to include what we've learned but my article is live:
505 Games Is Triple Dipping with Control Ultimate Edition
Maybe that would also mean that owners of the standard edition + season pass will get the free next-gen update nevertheless. This would be kind of hilarious if they would screw that up, too.To me it sounds like 505 messed up so bad that even if someone WANTED to digitally buy the Ultimate Edition when they already had the base game + season pass, they can't, because PSN thinks it's the same game?
I don't think Remedy has much of a say on the matter, but they're not blameless either.
But I agree that it would be nice to know what the hell happened.
Assuming it's 505's call, what do you think they could have done differently? Public condemn 505 and say that choice was outside their... control?
I don't think they've could have done much about it. And that's probably how it played out, this seems like typical publisher thing to do.
Seeing as 505 publishes Death Stranding on PC, but Sony publishes on PS4... I wonder about the fate of a DS PS5 patch, if there even is one
To further fuel the fire: I received a code for Control UE on PlayStation 4. I own the base game + season pass. I went to redeem the new code and it says I already own the game.
To me it sounds like 505 messed up so bad that even if someone WANTED to digitally buy the Ultimate Edition when they already had the base game + season pass, they can't, because PSN thinks it's the same game?