That actually funny I did too for some reason lolYou want to know what is funny?
When I was younger I always though Dues Ex was a Ubisoft game.
That actually funny I did too for some reason lolYou want to know what is funny?
When I was younger I always though Dues Ex was a Ubisoft game.
Does anybody think that Sony or Microsoft is interested in Square Enix? Securing Tomb Raider, Final Fantasy, Thief, Deus Ex and Avengers for your brand is quite a feat.
I wish Sony would consider splurging. The glow up these games would get under Sony's hand would just be stunning.
Exclusivity locked out of PC is something I dont want to see for IPs like Deus Ex and Tomb Raider.
Now if Sony would release those IPs on PC alongside on Playstation, I wouldnt mind (which is why I wouldnt mind MS doing it).
Either way, I just think Tomb Raider needs that glow-up, and so does Deus Ex and Thief. They would just be freaking stunning when treated as exclusives. I wish one of these juggernauts would consider it.If we talking just the western branch, I would imagine Microsoft being more likely to bite, if it's the entirety of SE, I could see Sony being willing to bite the bullet in order to not lose Final Fantasy.
Yeah the entirety of FFXV's plot leaked on 4chan, there's been some other stuff too I believe.For my part i believe this is fake but also there have been real leaks done in 4chan, don't know why people act as it was always fake
Yeah. it's probably pretty hard to determine currently. Avengers has had huge growth since then (like we see from box office numbers). Of course films are not only barometer for the success of the brand though.There's this graph but it's from 2014 so Avengers has probably grown quite significantly:
Would a delayed PC release be acceptable(Like what Sony has been doing lately with their PC ports)?
This has nothing to do with Square Enix. It's a Disney IP
Outside of FF and DQ, it's not like SE Japan is exactly rolling in IPs that sell great.
Oh! My bad sorry. I thought it would work like that.You wouldn't secure Avengers for anything, FYI. You don't get to randomly change predetermined licensing deals like that.
That is fine too but "lately"?
They've only done that for Horizon and its not consistent.
IOI is not a part of Square Enix anymore, i think they are an independent studio that's partnered with WB.
Deus Ex and Thief being exclusive to a console is the worst timeline a PC gamer can imagine.Does anybody think that Sony or Microsoft is interested in Square Enix? Securing Tomb Raider, Final Fantasy, Thief, Deus Ex and Avengers for your brand is quite a feat.
I wish Sony would consider splurging. The glow up these games would get under Sony's hand would just be stunning.
Sure, but you said all their success came from their japanese branch when that isn't true because Tomb Raider exists. The rumour here is quite unlikely because it includes Tomb Raider which is very lucrative for sure.
And consistency doesn't matter much when they still sell far less than Tomb Raider at its worst - that should show you the strength of that IP. At its best it sells way above any Final Fantasy game.
I kinda want to know the story behind this
Fair enough, let's say they do it for these properties. Would you accept this if it meant an amazing quality game backed either by their budget or by one of Sony's first party studios?
The wall collapsed at a Morton Salt storage facility
Its a real shame too, Cory Barlog was the cinematics director for Reboot Raider, and the Lost Legacy duo is chilling at Naughty Dog. Plenty of Sony talent that is perfect for helping CD course correct for Tomb Raider. The same thing is true for Deus Ex, but with Eidos/Microsoft.Either way, I just think Tomb Raider needs that glow-up, and so does Deus Ex and Thief. They would just be freaking stunning when treated as exclusives. I wish one of these juggernauts would consider it.
I'm not the one you asked, but I personally think Arkane is much more equipped to deal with franchises like Thief and Deus Ex than any of the Sony's first-party studios, Sony doesn't even make immersive sims. Tomb Raider is a different matter, but I'd like to see what Ninja Theory can make with a property.Fair enough, let's say they do it for these properties. Would you accept this if it meant an amazing quality game backed either by their budget or by one of Sony's first party studios?
You make an excellent point! I don't blame the talent in the studios. I really think something is off from the publisher's point of view...Its a real shame too, Cory Barlog was the cinematics director for Reboot Raider, and the Lost Legacy duo is chilling at Naughty Dog. Plenty of Sony talent that is perfect for helping CD course correct for Tomb Raider. The same thing is true for Deus Ex, but with Eidos/Microsoft.
HahaThe wall collapsed at a Morton Salt storage facility
Massive Spill at Morton Salt Factory
A salt spill at the Morton Salt facility in Chicago caused a partial wall collapse and an outpouring of salt into an Acura dealership next door.abcnews.go.comNot kosher: Morton Salt wall collapses, piles salt on cars
Morton Salt storage facility wall collapses dumping salt on cars parked at the neighboring dealershipwww.chicagotribune.com
Does anybody think that Sony or Microsoft is interested in Square Enix? Securing Tomb Raider, Final Fantasy, Thief, Deus Ex and Avengers for your brand is quite a feat.
I wish Sony would consider splurging. The glow up these games would get under Sony's hand would just be stunning.
For some reason i thought his name was Balrog and now im disappointed it isnt ;___;Its a real shame too, Cory Barlog was the cinematics director for Reboot Raider, and the Lost Legacy duo is chilling at Naughty Dog. Plenty of Sony talent that is perfect for helping CD course correct for Tomb Raider. The same thing is true for Deus Ex, but with Eidos/Microsoft.
When the FF movie bombed so bad, Enix came to the rescue and merged with Square. Don't know how much sales were of Avengers but just because SE is a big company now, doesn't mean they can afford to make big losses in gaming, if it'll affect the company bottomline. They aren't MS with deep pocketsThey expect to seel Crystal Dinamics and Eidos ans ome of their lessen western studios? IPs included? Just because ONE badly marketed game flopped because they thought people wanted a Destiny 2 but Marvel?
I said "in recent years". The TR that did well is like 7 years old by now.
SE screwed CD/Eidos at quite literally every step of the way this genYou make an excellent point! I don't blame the talent in the studios. I really think something is off from the publisher's point of view...
People seriously think Square Enix is going to sell their publishing branch, all eidos IPS and all the 5 studios they have? Lol
Didn't Rise also get the double whammy of launching on the same day as Fallout 4? I remember thinking why Microsoft or Square didn't consider delaying just a little bit.SE screwed CD/Eidos at quite literally every step of the way this gen
Rise of the Tomb Raider - Xbox timed exclusity
Deus Ex - Forcing the resource draining MP mode unto Mankind Divided, when its obvious that Eidos was having none of it
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - Launching opposite Spider-Man (what in the actual fuck was SE smoking?!)
Avengers - Spider-Man Sony exclusivity
Not one release, did they not fumble in some way or another
Square Enix has an enormous amount of it's value tied to assets that aren't going to help them sell consoles, like MMOs, mobile, and Manga.
It would probably be in the Bethesda price range but without the huge 30+ million selling IP like Elder Scrolls. It's possible MS could just not give a shit and buy them anyways knowing they'd never recoup their investment, but that's not typically how companies operate.
Jesus, I did not even remember that one...what an absolute train wreckDidn't Rise also get the double whammy of launching on the same day as Fallout 4? I remember thinking why Microsoft or Square didn't consider delaying just a little bit.
When the FF movie bombed so bad, Enix came to the rescue and merged with Square. Don't know how much sales were of Avengers but just because SE is a big company now, doesn't mean they can afford to make big losses in gaming, if it'll affect the company bottomline. They aren't MS with deep pockets
An FGC tournament was over capacity
True though SE gave up the Hitman IP for free. They're a bit weird in that context.I could see this being a Lionhead scenario. (Microsoft / Fable)
The publisher is unhappy with the output of their studio(s). So they want to sell the studio(s) to recoup some money, but potential buyers would only make the purchase if the IP is included. The result is a studio closure or two.
No publisher sells IP.
I don't think this is true
But
Why are people assuming Square would not sell their western IPs? Literally all of them bombed lol, the only one that could be worth something is Tomb Raider.