Hey I remember you, you were the dude who threw that huge fit when that japanese player at TGS posted all his impressions of the Panzer Dragoon remake, and you called him a liar, when the game shipped exactly as he said it did. I see what you're doing here.
Wow, what a perverse argument you use here. I never called him a liar. I called out his wording when he used the words "trash". That's not how a professional who makes games himself should speak. Also, it has nothing to do with the subject here.
Remasters use the original code and enhance them so in the end, the whole package is modified.
You can argue about the definition of a remake/remaster/port that has never been set in stone and that has been the cause of many discussions for years but the fact is those SEGA AGES have not completely been done from scratch. Most people will understand that a Remake is for the most part, remade from scratch.
That might not be the case in your world but maybe real people don't use your definition.
EDIT: the tweet didn't display before:
-runs worse than the Saturn OG ? lol, the original run at 15-20 fps. the remake runs at a stable 30fps for the most part
-absurd input lag. The input lag is when rotating camera. I didn't notice this during my gameplay but I was filming. But the wording used here is so hyperbolic as if the whole game has "absurd input lag". It's so incorrect. Ask people who actually played it.
-gfx aren't universally bad but barely match the Panzer Dragoon aesthetic. Where do I see complaints about this? Where?
I never said the game was perfect and I am of the first person who made a list of improvements that were necessary. I sent to the devs. But hey, the feedback he sent was clearly orientated. Maybe he was unhappy for political reasons. The fact is that's way too hyperbolic VS the real state of the game.
Again, stop derailing the topic with calumnious arguments.