So has NXGamer looked at this yet and if so what was his verdict?
Why, though? People buy games according to how litigious a publisher is?
Definitely unprofessional. Feel like the companies Social Media Community Manager is going at DF fullforce with it's Tweets and reaction. I do feel sorry for DF, mistakes happen and they've acknowledged it, but I feel like they should remove the video and re-up with the correct information. Your average joe gamer won't go back to the article or description for an update.
Seems like an honest mistake on the part of DF, based on the resolution of the captures.
They updated the article acknowledging this, but the CEO seems adamant that it should be sold as '4K@60fps' which clearly isn't the case at all.
Because companies trying to bully reviewers for their own incompetence and poor performance (since they admitted it drops to 1080p but doesn't play in 1080p whatever that means) of their game generates a lot of negative press and usually makes people not want to give them money in the future. DF also seems to have some small blame but much smaller than the false advertising from the developer and this is a dis-proportioned response to criticism.Why, though? People buy games according to how litigious a publisher is?
Well they say in their own press release that it can drop down to 1080p and <45fps.
And if it's location dependent then DF could have easily picked spots that are always 1080p without ever knowing.
Well they claimed the game it was 1080p all the time. I'm not trying to defend the developers but you know, they should check a bit better before claim such stuff because that's something which put in a bad light the company job.
Italian studio 34BigThings just sent out a press release announcing that Redout: Lightspeed Editionhas been updated to properly support Microsoft's Xbox One X console. As previously announced exclusively to Wccftech, Redout: Lightspeed Edition will support 4K@60FPS without any checkerboard rendering technique, though it maintains the dynamic resolution used on Xbox One to keep the frame rate up at all times.
Makes sense. I thought that end part was a tangent complaining about the complainers.
This is my reaction as well.Based on their reaction to this, I would never buy a 34BigThings game again.
The dev doing an unironic impression of Donald Trump ensures I'll never buy the game. Way more damaging than DF's article.
More specifically, we managed to scale the resolution between 90% and 50% of native 4k, which means the resolution goes from the upper limit of 3456×1944 to the lower one of 1920×1080
Yep. DF, you had one job...More like digital fallacy.. am I right ? * high fives *
But seriously when your claim to fame is being the number 1 source for fanboy fuel you better have your story correct or you will quickly be called out for it. Even if it was an honest mistake. It's just the nature of what they do.
Why, though? People buy games according to how litigious a publisher is?
Because companies trying to bully reviewers for their own incompetence and poor performance (since they admitted it drops to 1080p but doesn't play in 1080p whatever that means) of their game generates a lot of negative press and usually makes people not want to give them money in the future.
How? Xbox One X fans still have a game that isn't 4k 60fps like they advertised everywhere. You would have some point if like a day later they actually updated their game to perform as they claimed it would.Hey, I get it's not a fantastic approach to solve their PR problem with Xbox X fans...I'm just arguing that this method will probably do more to help their situation with Xbox X gamers than hurt their future game sales.
In this day and age, assuming blowback from this type of social media reaction is only theoretical.
I doubt this does them more harm in the end.
I haven't said the developers were the most honest in the earth, just to be clear. But really the whole video was focused on the 1080p chats. They never mentioned dynamic or whatever. That's why they should be more careful before talk about such stuff.https://wccftech.com/redout-lightspeed-edition-xbox-one-x-update/
I know, it may seem like I'm bullying or hating them, but this is not only a great lesson learned for DF (it may help to double check your findings or go easy on headlines) and the developers (take a step back and evaluate whether this is the final product you want to release).
Only after the fact that DF highlighted the 1080p resolution, they claimed that it was at 1080p. Throughout the whole video you can see that their games run worse on Xbox one X, which is a bad look.
The only reason why I'm hammering the 4k@60fps narrative is due to their action to go into a law suit. (more xbox one x games claim the 4k resolution, while it turns out to be checkerboard rendering).
They've made an good looking spiritual successor to Wipeout, so it's only more disappointing to see this.
Yup, what the hell is up with that response?I think threatening DF with legal action is completely ridiculous. This developer is just screwing themselves over.
Indeed they are, which is why it'll be especially interesting to see if they somehow managed to test an unpatched version of the title, had a technical hitch that munged their captures somehow or that the game sits at 1080P for a meaningful majority of time. and maybe some other reason that doesn't instantly spring to mind.Isn't DF usually pretty good at noting games that have dynamic resolutions?
You feel really bad for the developer at this point? That's your take from this? Did you read the whole thread or just skim the OP? DF do rech out to devs on occasion and some of them are willing to aid their analysis and others thankful when bugs/issues are highlighted so that they might be rectified in future updates.I watched the DF video and was thinking the same thing, it was a poor port, and now seeing this.. I really feel bad for the developer, this is where certain tech videos need to be QC better before actually posting finds, at least confirm with the developers first, I know DF does this so it's strange how they didn't reach out to the developer before starting a xBx port is bad video because that's how it comes out.
Well this game never renders native 4k, so if guerrilla can be sued for kz hahOk maybe we should take legal action against devs and publishers claiming their games are 4K when they are clearly not. Clear case of false advertising from pretty much the entire console industry.
The ceo did.
Some don't buy games from developers they don't want to support. If people think these developers are going overboard and being ridiculous, they might not want to give money to them in the future.
Same reason (albeit less drastic) why some people don't spend money on games with GG ties.
I haven't said the developers were the most honest in the earth, just to be clear. But really the whole video was focused on the 1080p chats. They never mentioned dynamic or whatever. That's why they should be more careful before talk about such stuff.
For sure. They did fuck up and an amendment and an apology would've worked wonders; I haven't seen their analysis but folks are saying they amended it, no?
UPDATE: Tip of the hat to VGTech, for confirming dynamic resolution scaling with a different shot selection. How the scaler works is something we'll take a look at, as even the simplest shots in our sample came in at native 1080p. Check out his work here: https://youtu.be/nOcdg7ZRB0k
They wrote that "How the scaler works is something we'll take another look at, as even the simplest shots in our sample came in at native 1080p" in their update to the article, so updated video is probably coming.
As long as you agree they should be sued right back for very blatant false advertising and much worse misinformation than d
they are talking about the game resolution scaler, not their capture device.Yeah, I read that in the article too. At the very least, remove the video for now. Hopefully they can update the scaler soon and won't come across any of these issues in the future, I really enjoy their videos and would hate for them to get any flak because of this small mistake.
With inaccurate information of their own like stating that 1080p is 50% of 4k?
https://wccftech.com/redout-lightspeed-edition-xbox-one-x-update/
I know, it may seem like I'm bullying or hating them, but this is not only a great lesson learned for DF (it may help to double check your findings or go easy on headlines) and the developers (take a step back and evaluate whether this is the final product you want to release).
Only after the fact that DF highlighted the 1080p resolution, they claimed that it was at 1080p. Throughout the whole video you can see that their games run worse on Xbox one X, which is a bad look.
The only reason why I'm hammering the 4k@60fps narrative is due to their action to go into a law suit. (more xbox one x games claim the 4k resolution, while it turns out to be checkerboard rendering).
They've made an good looking spiritual successor to Wipeout, so it's only more disappointing to see this.
I haven't said the developers were the most honest in the earth, just to be clear. But really the whole video was focused on the 1080p chats. They never mentioned dynamic or whatever. That's why they should be more careful before talk about such stuff.
? I've had Redout on my PC for over a year and a half.
damn this is the best ether.Doesnt like to get called "lazy" and "incompetent", proceeds to call exactly that to DF staff. Really fucking classy. This dev is a dumbass and handled this extremely poorly.
It seems the person who wrote the post calculated it this way:
50% of 3840 = 1920
50% of 2160 = 1080
-> 50% of 3840x2160 = 1920x1080
Of course that's not how this works lol.
My takeaway from all of this is that Redout's dynamic res scaling sucks.
But they said it runs only at 1080p by the way eh. And they admitted to be wrong. What I'm trying to say that something not totally unexpectable from a company such reaction.DF has built up plenty of trust over the years. Meanwhile, you have a dev that is immediately threatening a press outlet with lawsuits for simply reporting what it found, and giving exclusives to WCCFTech, a "media outlet" that is best known for running "reviews" of leaked beta software.
Makes ya wonder why DF gets the benefit of the doubt, doesn't it?
If the game runs at 1080p for the majority of the time, then it makes sense that DF would report that it runs at 1080p.