There's no real reason to carry this on. Nobody else is going to bat for dino fish, so you don't have anything to prove.
Anybody but Trump. Do you believe in that concept as it relates to Democrats, Independents, or jaded Republicans? If so, then it's clearly possible for people to be for Sanders just because he's not Trump while simultaneously not knowing the details of his M4A proposal, and some of whom would not be as likely to vote for him because of that proposal once they understand the details. That's a completely valid scenario. I don't need evidence for that. It's just speculation, which is what 99% of this thread is.
Oh does she?
These are directly from her book.
Let me say this very clear so nobody can misunderstand me.
If you are backing Williamson in any way, you're dangerous, misinformed, and are the literal ill of our democracy that is crumbling because of social cancers like Williamson getting public spotlight from serious candidate who are qualified in multiple ways to handle the series issues that our nation and world need to face.
Oh does she?
These are directly from her book.
Let me say this very clear so nobody can misunderstand me.
If you are backing Williamson in any way, you're dangerous, misinformed, and are the literal ill of our democracy that is crumbling because of social cancers like Williamson getting public spotlight from serious candidate who are qualified in multiple ways to handle the series issues that our nation and world need to face.
Oh does she?
These are directly from her book.
Let me say this very clear so nobody can misunderstand me.
If you are backing Williamson in any way, you're dangerous, misinformed, and are the literal ill of our democracy that is crumbling because of social cancers like Williamson getting public spotlight from serious candidates who are qualified in multiple ways to handle the series issues that our nation and world need to face.
Oh does she?
These are directly from her book.
Let me say this very clear so nobody can misunderstand me.
If you are backing Williamson in any way, you're dangerous, misinformed, and are the literal ill of our democracy that is crumbling because of social cancers like Williamson getting public spotlight from serious candidates who are qualified in multiple ways to handle the series issues that our nation and world need to face.
Oh does she?
These are directly from her book.
Let me say this very clear so nobody can misunderstand me.
If you are backing Williamson in any way, you're dangerous, misinformed, and are the literal ill of our democracy that is crumbling because of social cancers like Williamson getting public spotlight from serious candidates who are qualified in multiple ways to handle the series issues that our nation and world need to face.
They hyped it as the battle between Warren and Sanders.. They wanted it so badly and tried desperately to manufacture friction between them.
The only thing I can really think of is the opening narration when they were saying they were competing for the same voters and such (which isn't entirely true really). Was there anything from inside the debate itself that suggested this?
The entire preshow was pushing the narrative that they'd be attacking each other, even went as far as saying they had a report that Sanders would attack Warren for being unelectable lol.
