• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Baladium

Banned
Apr 18, 2018
5,410
Sleep Deprivation Zone
lBnFM78.png

TOUCHY-FEELY CREEPY BIDEN IS BAAAAACK

/s?
 

Royalan

I can say DEI; you can't.
Moderator
Oct 24, 2017
11,919
Kamala: did well. landed some zingers. Executed well on not being far left.

Bernie: didn't differentiate himself from Warren.

Warren: didn't differentiate herself from Biden.

Biden: did what he needed to do. I can't stand him, but I'm not blind. He did what he needed to do to hold on to his lead.

Castro: He didn't destroy Biden. But he did enough to raise in the polls.
 

ibyea

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,163
idk if you asked me an hour ago how Biden did I would've said this was his best performance but he really seemed lost with a few of his answers. like much worse than the "Joe 303030" crap
Yeah, after a bit, I thought he was doing well, putting out decent attacks against Sanders and Warren (I disagreed with them of course), but then it all fell apart in an instant with his ramble on the segregation question.
 

Nola

Banned
Oct 29, 2017
8,025
More options. More competition. A better shot at carrying a democratic nominee across the finish line first than banning it.

All that matters is where the public appetite sits. This is an election not a TED talk with no consequences. Outside of beating Trump, Healthcare is the premier issue so I will argue for any democratic candidate who doesnt drop the ball on the issue and gamble away our chances on all of the lesser issues. Bernie and Warren have tried every angle to get people to back an insurance ban, on what grounds can one argue its the superior stance politically, as the quoted poster has argued.
As I said, I am not interested right now in arguing where the Overton window is. I think that is a concern, but you yourself are missing some critical pieces of input on calculating that.

More competition doesn't produce better consumer pricing or choice though. That's the paradoxical problem with for-profit insurance(and health insurance in general) and why Switzerland continues to struggle with costs compared to countries anchored around single-payer. The way insurers can actually provide lower consumer prices is through larger market share, because it better spreads risk, increases leverage over often stronger positioned hospitals and care specialists. But the slimmer administrative costs and maximal economies of scale of single-payer will always outperform a fractured, less market-leading private insurer(while providing total consumer choice). And as someone that worked on the administrative side for a major regional hospital, private insurers, even large ones, do far less in terms of negotiating than you could imagine.

And so frankly, I might actually be more inclined to give a pass to the Biden's, Harris's, and Klobucher's on this if they at least had a logically consistent ethos they were arguing from that wasn't poised for the same pitfalls as their predecessor who was actually far more savvy. But their position is equally if not more faulty long-term than the left-wing alternative. As there is not a world where a strong, well structured public option that can get us to UHC also preserves consumer private insurance choice. The only way you preserve that is by anchoring your system around that notion(Switzerland) or you implement a crippled public option that is insanely subsidized and much more expensive over the long haul than a major transition to single-payer.

Their pathway creates the exact same problem(and more) except they are locking themselves into the same set of lies that Obama caught himself up with. If the Overton window is so central to you, you should be equally mad at how poorly they are trying to argue within it.

So I am fine with the Overton window conversation, but if you don't think there are insanely, critically flawed issues with the moderate wings approach that will walk us right into the same problems we have now with the ACA, you are naiively mistaken.
 
Last edited:

Malleymal

Member
Oct 28, 2017
6,280
You know what...

I am done with the debates. This shit is just getting repetitive. I like the top 5 or so. Wake me up after this phase is done.
 

RussTC3

Banned
Nov 28, 2018
1,878
It's suggested as being disqualifying because it goes against what the country is looking for in a candidate. It was also inaccurate.

I think this is what a lot of the Democratic base doesn't understand with regards to the strength of Biden. He's looked upon as a forceful, strong and balanced voice against Trump. We need a new path, he's a guarantee towards a new path that's, in a word, comfortable.

Comfortable is comforting and a strength that is hard to replicate. It's a guiding light towards fixing the broken aspects of our country.
 

Gashprex

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,029
Serious question - Castro was actually factually incorrect on his attack on Biden - but nobody will care right? Facts don't matter in a post trump world right?
 

lacer

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,693
gotta love these anti-m4a ads. who's paying for this shit
 

Heromanz

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
20,202
It's suggested as being disqualifying because it goes against what the country is looking for in a candidate.

I think this is what a lot of the Democratic base doesn't understand with regards to the strength of Biden. He's looked upon as a forceful, strong and balanced voice against Trump. We need a new path, he's a guarantee towards a new path that's, in a word, comfortable.

Comfortable is comforting and a strength that is hard to replicate. It's a guiding light towards fixing the broken aspects of our country.
Biden isn't a new path. It the old demo path.
 

Deleted member 11637

Oct 27, 2017
18,204
MSNBC's panel seems to believe Biden destroyed Castro. 🤔
 

Brinbe

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
58,032
Terana
real talk, at this point, punditry is real fucking stupid. maybe they talk to the average non-politically inclined person... but for any reasonable adult that pays a bit of attention, they all offer absolutely nothing and that they have the ability to actually set discourse is a tragedy. it's all dumb fluff, just like the garbage that stephan a smith or skip bayless spew, except about politics, which is absurd considering actual lives are at stake here.

ppl are better off not wasting time on it. or better yet, just axing it from the general media altogether.
 

Bonafide

Member
Oct 11, 2018
936
It's suggested as being disqualifying because it goes against what the country is looking for in a candidate.

I think this is what a lot of the Democratic base doesn't understand with regards to the strength of Biden. He's looked upon as a forceful, strong and balanced voice against Trump. We need a new path, he's a guarantee towards a new path that's, in a word, comfortable.

Comfortable is comforting and a strength that is hard to replicate. It's a guiding light towards fixing the broken aspects of our country.

biden aint changing shit

being comfortable is a delusion, people need to not go back to sleep
 

offshore

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,052
UK
Was Castro really playing the age card? I didn't get that impression; it just seemed more a general attack.
 

Papaya

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
2,474
California
Shit debate. They were really trying to prop up the lame candidates, and all I wanted to hear was Bernie, Warren, and Biden cause that's all that matters.

Waste of time, except for the fact Biden may lower even more.
 

Stick

Member
Oct 30, 2017
1,295
One thing I will say after watching this, is that my confidence in Biden continues to dip. I mean it's already low after the first 2 debates and his many mishaps in public appearances, but damn... . I don't think anyone did extremely well, but Biden is definitely showing me more and more that he shouldn't be the leading democrat.
 
May 26, 2018
23,992
real talk, at this point, punditry is real fucking stupid. maybe they talk to the average non-politically inclined person... but for any reasonable adult that pays a bit of attention, they all offer absolutely nothing. it's fluff, just like the garbage that stephan a smith or skip bayless spew, except about politics. ppl are better off not wasting time on it.

Yeah, it feels like sport network stuff for the most part.
 

Prodigal Son

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,791
can someone explain to me why its outrageous that there werent abortion questions directed at a field of candidates who all have virtually identical positions on abortion
 

TheModestGun

Banned
Dec 5, 2017
3,781
Fuck this stupid resilience question. What is the, interviews for a high school yearbook club? This kind of question can never result in anything but vague platitudes and old sayings.
 

RussTC3

Banned
Nov 28, 2018
1,878
Democrats never win with prevent defense...but we never learn.
Well of course not. I'm not advocating that.

Hillary Clinton's campaign is proof of that. They didn't go on the offense and didn't fight for Democratic strongholds and it cost her the election (PA, MI, etc). This is a different problem.