• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

JABEE

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,853
What I Hate about Bernie is that he doesn't answer the question and just slaps on his favorite mix-tape that requires a pencil to rewind
Saying he voted against the Iraq War, increased military funding, and defending Democratic Socialism is a mix-tape answer.

Sanders needs to differentiate himself and attack Biden on their ideological differences.
 

Joe

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,605
lol, Yang's hand gestures made me laugh.

But also, I like democracy dollars as a concept, so go him. Although, he should probably do a bit more to differentiate between "I will give everyone 1000 dollars" and "I will give everyone 1000 democracy dollars." People gonna get confused and think they're the same thing.
 
Oct 25, 2017
4,964
I didn't say anything about Hillary as a candidate, I preferred Bernie personally, but he didn't win the primary unfortunately. I said she dominated the debates, which she did.



Yep, she "lost":

Clinton - 65,853,514
Trump - 62,984,828

i had to check the date because i might have fallen through a wormhole reading this
 

Blue Skies

Banned
Mar 27, 2019
9,224
Booker, Castro, O'rourke are all basically running for Vice President

yang klobuchar and biden will be irrelevant a year from now

Harris will keep following the dream

bernie will lead in the senate
 

Zed

Member
Oct 28, 2017
2,544

hitme

Member
Oct 26, 2017
3,909
Screw democracy dollars, let's have...

e5aea512338a2d88.png
 

Nola

Member
Oct 29, 2017
8,025
Options for plans, options for doctors, option for location, options for cost. Do you know how healthcare works??? It's not one size fits all. Nobody wants one size fits all. Even in countries that have universal coverage, they allow private insurance to compete.


If Delaney doesnt want to ban private insurance then go ahead and indict the majority of the electorate then. You shouldnt be a coward on the issue.


Which would be similar to what happened to many other transformative bills, like the ACA. Many of which passed only after the most controversial aspects were stripped out, laying the foundation you speak of for future efforts. The problem is acting like a take it or leave it approach on something so clearing negative (according to polling) will not have a defining effect depending on who the nominee is. Politics have only become more and more polarized, campaigns aren't the etch a sketch they used to be.
What does private insurance add to the healthcare system that losing it would sacrifice?

We can argue the mythical political resting place for where public appetitie sits, and I agree that issue should not be handwaved away, but you seem to be making a core argument in favor of private insurance as some general good for the system, but your own argument seems to disprove it, but I want to hear your argument before I make too many assumptions.