I mean they have to tell the public what their plans are. They known that this is public.As a Brit it's really strange to hear questions like "where do you get the leverage against China?" as if the Chinese aren't watching.
It's like in Britain where they talk about where the leverage is against the EU, as if the EU aren't paying attention.
Then don't look at what they've said and how it was interpreted during campaigning. Look at their records.I also said he couldn't escape that, but alright. It's clear that he understood the underlying evil that causes people to go astray, that's a punishing criminal justice system, poverty, etc... Because he laid out those facts, I trust his values over somebody who campaigned for being tougher on crime compared to the previous DA. That's Harris, who mostly just goes with what's popular.
It really is. As somebody else pointed out, he'll get a 1% bump. Well I'll say 2-3%. And he probably won't go any higher after he leaves Texas.
Dude has a bright future but not as president.
As a Brit it's really strange to hear questions like "where do you get the leverage against China?" as if the Chinese aren't watching.
It's like in Britain where they talk about where the leverage is against the EU, as if the EU aren't paying attention.
IP theft is a reason why China doesn't need access to American markets as Warren mistakenly said.