• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Dream Machine

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,085
Your first post was a classic whataboutism.
How is saying, "I wonder if we will ever learn that we are doing the same things we are so appalled by and change it" a bad thing?

Another word for "whataboutism" is critical thinking. Is your goal to stop critical thinking? How are we allowed to bring these comparisons up without them being whataboutism, may I ask? If I said "actually russia is fine because we do it too" you would have a point, but my point is that we are bad when we behave the same way as Russia (the premise being that russia is bad, as it's not a good comparison) and we should stop acting like them, so... maybe define "classic whataboutism" so I can avoid it in the future.
 

MrGerbils

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
314
User Warned: Low effort, inflammatory drive-by.
Reactionary centrists are a far bigger threat to our democracy than Russia.
 

Ichthyosaurus

Banned
Dec 26, 2018
9,375
No elections should be interfered with. It's a big deal to interfere with another country's elections and should be treated as such.

Post should have ended there.

I find it hard to believe many people who are disgusted by Putin interfering hate both when they have no concept of US international interference throughout history, and are actively cheering on the same behavior whenever it's not here. That "I hate both" rhetoric gets lost extremely fast once the coup, invasion, undermining of democracy, or toppling of local government gets dressed up with "spreading democracy" and taken at face value.

This assumes every poster talking to you agrees with that stance when that's far from the case. You seem to be mistaking Democrats for Republicans here.

Put your soviet propaganda comparisons and your leftist dick away, please

That post had nothing to do with the Soviets? Are you stanning for the Soviet's now?

The post was made to say we should learn that what we casually do to other people is a real crisis when it happens to us, so we should learn from that, but we probably won't considering even bringing it up causes everyone to get defensive and bring out out their whataboutisms (hold on, that's a russian thing too!!!)

Except the people you were arguing with agreed with you about interfering with elections. People are getting testy because you're shrugging off people saying they dislike any government doing that, including the US.

Why are you taking an amusing, if not joking, tone about the serious issue of Russia interfering with the US electoral systems? Do you like Trump? Because he's a result of that. Are you a Tulsi fan, by chance?
 

Dream Machine

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,085
Post should have ended there.



This assumes every poster talking to you agrees with that stance when that's far from the case. You seem to be mistaking Democrats for Republicans here.



That post had nothing to do with the Soviets? Are you stanning for the Soviet's now?



Except the people you were arguing with agreed with you about interfering with elections. People are getting testy because you're shrugging off people saying they dislike any government doing that, including the US.

Why are you taking an amusing, if not joking, tone about the serious issue of Russia interfering with the US electoral systems? Do you like Trump? Because he's a result of that. Are you a Tulsi fan, by chance?
I'm talking about America, not just posters in this thread. Not everything is about you, Ichthyosaurus. Obviously a lot of Americans (namely the ones in power but also the people who defend their positions) feel that way because it's demonstrated in how we conduct our country internationally. We feel it's okay to interfere with other country's governments and electoral processes if it's beneficial to us (financially or "morally"). Is this really debatable?

-----

Why don't you ask that poster if that phrase has nothing to do with soviets and get back to me. Don't accuse me of stanning for soviets just because you're ignorant.

------

I'm not shrugging off anybody, I'm saying this fervor in the broader Liberal sphere should stick around when we're doing it to other people as well, not just when it happens to us. Otherwise it's obnoxious and self-centered.

-----

Because my tone has nothing to do with how these important issue will be handled, so I'll talk about it however I feel like. Sometimes humans use a light tone when conversing about all manner of subject matter, you see, and I'm not a fan of literal tone policing. I'm not a fan of Trump , to say the least, nor Tulsi. I'm not a fan of liberals and Americans who take literally zero responsibility for Trump's election because making it all russia's fault is much easier than looking at or addressing systematic issues that led us to this point. I'm not a fan of bullshit, and the way the slightest critique or apt comparison to a country liberals see as beneath them leads immediately to attempted smearing (are you a soviet? MAGA Trumper!? TULSI FAN!!??) is so silly.
 

Deleted member 31817

Nov 7, 2017
30,876
Like with her support for Assad you can at least trace the timeline and beliefs that got her there. For thinking that Trump is trying to distance himself from Putin AND that it's causing threats of nuclear war is just tremendously dumb.
 

KingK

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,847
The 3 candidates thus far who are not pushing for Medicare for all

1. Klobuchar
2. Beto
3. Buttigieg

Soon


4. Biden
To be fair to Pete, he is at least explicit that he wants single payer as an end goal, with the buy in as a way to transition there.

It's still the only area I wish he'd come out stronger though, and just go straight for single payer, even though he's still my favorite. But realistically in the end, Medicare buy in transition to single payer was always the most likely way to get it through Congress.


Talk about dumb takes

Yeah, how exactly has Trump tried to distance himself from Putin? He's been defending him and bending over backwards for the last 2 years.
 

Dream Machine

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,085
Imagine doing all these events despite not having any strong political convictions. I'm starting to think he just really likes attention.
He's a poster. He lives for the likes, quotes, and retwteets. He was born for this.
I love when people constantly deflect criticism of Russia onto our own misdeeds. It's some 'All elections matter' shit.
I love when people constantly deflect criticism of our own country's misdeeds and failings onto russia. Lol
 

Royalan

I can say DEI; you can't.
Moderator
Oct 24, 2017
11,943
I love when people constantly deflect criticism of our own country's misdeeds and failings onto russia. Lol

Sure, but what's the relevance to this thread?

Usually, when somebody's deflecting to the US' misdeeds, its in threads where that pivot is clearly off-topic.

We can talk about how the 2016 election was hacked without having to have a debate on every American misstep going back 100 years.
 

Dream Machine

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,085
Sure, but what's the relevance to this thread?

Usually, when somebody's deflecting to the US' misdeeds, its in threads where that pivot is clearly off-topic.

We can talk about how the 2016 election was hacked without having to have a debate on every American misstep going back 100 years.
We can also say that we hope being hacked gives us some empathy and perspective for other countries and our own history, and might make us think twice about our own intervention tactics in the future, right? It's relevant because international policy is something presidential nominees should be aware of and talking about, and if someone wants to be president, having such a myopic view as "russia is the reason for trump" doesn't give me confidence in their future international or domestic policy decisions.

I hope that makes sense.
 

Mezentine

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,971
I haven't been following too much but Warren is rapidly going from one of the less interesting candidates to me to one of the front runners with some of the policy stuff I'm seeing
 

Royalan

I can say DEI; you can't.
Moderator
Oct 24, 2017
11,943
We can also say that we hope being hacked gives us some empathy and perspective for other countries and our own history, and might make us think twice about our own intervention tactics in the future, right? It's relevant because international policy is something presidential nominees should be aware of and talking about, and if someone wants to be president, having such a myopic view as "russia is the reason for trump" doesn't give me confidence in their future international or domestic policy decisions.

I hope that makes sense.

It's makes sense, and it's fair. Still, it's somewhat of a reach.

This is 2020 Dem Primary thread. Talking about how the Dems were hacked by Russia in the leadup to the 2016 primaries is a fair and closely related topic.
 

Dream Machine

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,085
It's makes sense, and it's fair. Still, it's somewhat of a reach.

This is 2020 Dem Primary thread. Talking about how the Dems were hacked by Russia in the leadup to the 2016 primaries is a fair and closely related topic.
I think looking at the whole context of these situations is important for discussing them, especially when people are pointedly asking others "what should we do about russia?" Especially since a lot of the interfering we have done destabilizing other countries in the past has come from the question "what should we do about russia?"

But I'll steer clear of the topic in here from now on because being accused of being a soviet stan and a trump supporter for it isn't good for my health.
 

Deleted member 5666

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,753
Imagine doing all these events despite not having any strong political convictions. I'm starting to think he just really likes attention.
All I want from 2020 is 51-52 senate seats. Whatever the best way to achieve that goal is what matters most.

That's what most matters for making sure we have a progressive agenda and a Dem President, nearly any Dem, who is there to sign the bills into law. As major policy is written in congress not the White House.
 

Pwnz

Member
Oct 28, 2017
14,279
Places


Even though his response to that Brexit question was hot garbage, credit where credit is due on his campaigning


While some will analyze the sloppy start from minute to minute, this is betos endurance. His ground game is ridiculous, he visited every county in Texas.

Half of the time when I check Facebook he's live. He's live in Wisconsin right now.
 

Deleted member 31817

Nov 7, 2017
30,876
All I want from 2020 is 51-52 senate seats. Whatever the best way to achieve that goal is what matters most.

That's all that matters for making sure we have a progressive agenda and a Dem, any Dem, who is there to sign the bills into law. As major policy is written in congress not the White House.
Beto getting senate seats to flip would be great. Beto causing senate seats to stagnate by refusing to endorse the democrat tho... lul
 

Ryuelli

Member
Oct 26, 2017
15,209
He puts in work like no other when it comes to ground game. Dudes getting big crowds at his stops too, I'd definitely lean toward online circles underestimating him at the moment.

This man can excite folks, I know because I've been to one of his rallies. These things are only going to continue to grow as the campaign goes on. He's incredibly inspiring.

One of his stops in Wisconsin (his only stop in Wisconsin? Not quite sure how many he was doing there) had a crowd out the door this morning.


Half of the time when I check Facebook he's live.

When he went offline for the last time after his Senate campaign it kind of felt like losing a friend, lol. I'd occasionally have his stream on as background noise.
 

Vector

Member
Feb 28, 2018
6,641
Even if he loses the nom, Beto is a one man army and should be all over the country stumping for the nominee. He's kinda crazy.
 

Deleted member 5666

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,753
Beto getting senate seats to flip would be great. Beto causing senate seats to stagnate by refusing to endorse the democrat tho... lul
If you think the democratic nominee for president wouldn't endorse the senate seats that is really really reaching lol. The Hurd thing was stupid as fuck just like Biden with GOP congressman in Michigan but no matter who the Dem nominee is they are not going to campaign against a Dem nominee for senate. They are the top of they ticket nationally. Being the top of the ticket for the entire country means you essentially control the party and the responsibility that entails. Same reason why you wouldnt see Bernie endorse primary challengers if he became President. Having control of the senate is the only way to get policy through so for the selfish intent to have a impactful first term all nominees would work on that.
 
Last edited:
Oct 25, 2017
10,326
He puts in work like no other when it comes to ground game. Dudes getting big crowds at his stops too, I'd definitely lean toward online circles underestimating him at the moment.

It's the separating factor between him and the field, his campaign is going to look radically different from any other candidate. Even Bernie's campaign is running like a polished, standard campaign so far.

Dude is a machine with his self live coverage of his campaign, which could even be the way to counter the "Trump all day" media cycle.
 

BackLogJoe

The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
1,213
Without the Comey letter we would have had a woman President 2 years ago.


Bernie is going to enact anarchy? Or socialism? How? With a senate that will either still be GOP controlled or barely Dem controlled where centrist Dem senators will be the swing voters on everything?

Even the *best* case scenario is we will have centrist senators like Manchin, Sinema, etc being the deciding votes in a 50-51 seat majority. You need to tamper expectations. A lot. Who is President will not change any of these facts.

You act like the election was close. Clinton got slaughtered.
 

Dream Machine

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,085
I think Beto can win, the reason i don't support him is that i don't know what he would do with that win.

I hope he uses his campaigning powers for good and runs for president and senate at the same time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.