• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Distantmantra

Member
Oct 26, 2017
11,149
Seattle
Haven't watched, but I have to know. Is there any explanation for Raniere's fucking volleyball obsession? Every article I've read on this has them basically doing two things, running (obviously so they'll look like pre-pubescent girls for the pedophile) and playing volleyball day and night.

They don't go into the volleyball thing, but it's definitely weird. I read a bunch of articles from people thinking the same thing.
 

G_Shumi

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 26, 2017
7,135
Cleveland, OH
Sunday night's ratings. ABC's "Supermarket Sweep" debuted last night to a solid 1.0, but of course nothing can top football:

Fast-Demo-2020-Oct-18-SUN.png


http://www.showbuzzdaily.com/articles/the-sked-sunday-network-scorecard-10-18-2020.html
 

TDLink

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
8,411
Haven't watched, but I have to know. Is there any explanation for Raniere's fucking volleyball obsession? Every article I've read on this has them basically doing two things, running (obviously so they'll look like pre-pubescent girls for the pedophile) and playing volleyball day and night.
Not really. Think it was just another form of control. They mention in the documentary that he was pretty enigmatic/intentionally hid himself from all but the most upper echelons of the cult. So the volleyball games were one of the few opportunities to see, meet, and talk with him as a lower level person. And there are multiple clips of people meeting him here and him having deep conversations of bullshit with them to ingrain them further into the cult. One of those clips was of Alison Mack even. But why Volleyball specifically, I don't know. Maybe he just genuinely enjoyed it.

And not to defend the guy, because he's a fucking monster, but I don't think he's a pedophile. At least nothing in the documentary indicates he would be.
 

vhoanox

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,156
Vietnam
www.hollywoodreporter.com

Channing Dungey Named Chairman of Warner Bros. TV Group

Shortly after departing Netflix, Channing Dungey has landed at Warner Bros. TV.

At Netflix, she oversaw drama series including Self Made: Inspired by the Life of Madam CJ Walker, Away and Rhimes' upcoming Bridgerton, and some of the company's high-profile (and high dollar) overall deals, including those with Rhimes, Kenya Barris, Steven DeKnight, Regina King, Mara Brock Akil, Bill Prady, Michael Green, Gina Rodriguez and former U.S. President and First Lady Barack and Michelle Obama's Higher Ground Productions.

In 2 years she signed a bunch of these mega deals for Netflix and just left. What will happen to some of these talents, will they follow her?
 

Spectromixer

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
16,619
USA
Not really. Think it was just another form of control. They mention in the documentary that he was pretty enigmatic/intentionally hid himself from all but the most upper echelons of the cult. So the volleyball games were one of the few opportunities to see, meet, and talk with him as a lower level person. And there are multiple clips of people meeting him here and him having deep conversations of bullshit with them to ingrain them further into the cult. One of those clips was of Alison Mack even. But why Volleyball specifically, I don't know. Maybe he just genuinely enjoyed it.

And not to defend the guy, because he's a fucking monster, but I don't think he's a pedophile. At least nothing in the documentary indicates he would be.

Spoilers for season two I guess but

One of the charges Keith was convicted of is "Sexual exploitation of a child and possession of child pornography"
 

TDLink

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
8,411
Spoilers for season two I guess but

One of the charges Keith was convicted of is "Sexual exploitation of a child and possession of child pornography"
Ah, interesting. Well, didn't know that. Also seems kinda counter to his MO as presented in the doc, but it will be interesting to see how that plays out.
 

Deleted member 5853

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
12,725
In 2 years she signed a bunch of these mega deals for Netflix and just left. What will happen to some of these talents, will they follow her?
I would expect a couple would. I think, at the moment, Barris is a prime candidate to jump ship since he hasn't produced much for Netflix and the one thing he has isn't setting the world on fire.
 

Conditional-Pancakes

The GIFs of Us
Member
Jun 25, 2020
10,829
the wilderness
Spoilers for season two I guess but

One of the charges Keith was convicted of is "Sexual exploitation of a child and possession of child pornography"

Yikes!!

The first season definitely had many flaws, but I did enjoy it. I'll probably watch season 2.

And I'm giving serious side-eye to the people saying they don't have any sympathy for the victims. I don't believe anybody saying that they (or their loved ones) are so balanced that they will never fall prey to such things. These organizations prey on vulnerable people by giving them community and love. Nobody can pretend they'll never face enough hardship in their life that they won't ever get vulnerable to cults like these.

The thing to understand is that you cannot educate or berate people into not joining cults. That's not how it works. The only way to stop shit like this is by making sure society can meet people's needs, changing the conditions that push people to these cults. Because these predatory organizations are unfortunately the only place some people can find to fill the emotional void they have in their life. The hundreds of members of the organization in this documentary weren't just dumb, simple-minded people.

Anyway, while not perfect, I thought the show gave a good insight into what a modern cult can look like.

Also, speaking of The Vow, this made me laugh:



 

DanGo

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,739
Oh, I don't exactly feel bad for any of the ex-members who are presented in the doc, especially the members who were high up in the organization and very integrated like Mark and Sarah. I mean, I have some level of sympathy for them, of course -- they were all ultimately victims of this thing. But at the same time they were perpetrators too. I know the doc goes into that and has scenes of them feeling guilty about it, but it all rings slightly hollow, not to mention (and forgive my cynicism here) how while they aren't listed as producers on this project, they are no doubt making a lot of money off of it.

I think Catherine Oxenberg is the only "main" focused on individual who comes across as completely sympathetic. The older girlfriend of Keith's they had a few episodes ago as well, because she actually got out early before the cult was essentially a cult, and was very clearly preyed upon from the get-go.

The main reason the cult worked as well as it did is because it preyed upon people who were already vulnerable and looking for something to fill a void each individual had.
Yeah, I don't mean to say Mark and others are presented as overly sympathetic, but I also think the doc is a little coy about being critical or drawing specific conclusions about how the cult operated and who it preyed on, and thus on some of the personality traits of the doc's main characters. There's a lot for viewers to read between the lines of and dots to connect, but it holds back from scrutinizing how the cult systematically targeted people primed to buy this pseudo-intellectual garbage, and simultaneously to push away and vilify skeptics and real critical thinkers. The doc's more explicit about how people were conditioned for more extreme behaviors once they became members (ie. leading the women into DOS) than about entry itself. There's a lot of talk about how normal people can be sucked into the group, but there's limited inspection of that claim. I suspect this is a byproduct of turning the same people into the protagonists of the story, and of the documentarians being so reliant on their footage and continued participation.
 

DanGo

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,739
And I'm giving serious side-eye to the people saying they don't have any sympathy for the victims. I don't believe anybody saying that they (or their loved ones) are so balanced that they will never fall prey to such things. These organizations prey on vulnerable people by giving them community and love. Nobody can pretend they'll never face enough hardship in their life that they won't ever get vulnerable to cults like these.

The thing to understand is that you cannot educate or berate people into not joining cults. That's not how it works. The only way to stop shit like this is by making sure society can meet people's needs, changing the conditions that push people to these cults. Because these predatory organizations are unfortunately the only place some people can find to fill the emotional void they have in their life. The hundreds of members of the organization in this documentary weren't just dumb, simpleminded people.
I'm not sure anyone said they don't have sympathy. I didn't. I just also don't think the doc gave proper context for Mark Vicente's background, and that really jumped out at me from the moment of his introduction since I knew something about him prior (I didn't follow this NXIVM news at all really, so had no idea he was involved until the doc). There's a reason he climbed so high so fast and it's not just because he had media experience, it's because he also previously had explicit interests in woo-woo pseudoscience and psychobabble. I think ignoring that kind of thing is missing part of the story.

I don't disagree with what you're saying, but I don't think the doc does a very good job of exploring those elements. I don't think it directly says much at all about "making sure society can meet people's needs, changing the conditions that push people to these cults." I don't think there's much inspection of the circumstances that allow a group like this to thrive. It's lacking an outside voice, which I think problematically allows the characters in charge of the narrative and narrow its scope.

Like, somewhat tangentially, I'd have loved a moment of exploration about the Mexican chapter of the cult in last night's episode. We get to see a little of Raniere talking to them, and Vicente says it was full of wealthy people and that there's money down there, but it doesn't go beyond that. I'd have loved a little discussion about why the group was attracting a very particular slice of the population, and the interactions between their class status and greater Mexican social problems.
 

Conditional-Pancakes

The GIFs of Us
Member
Jun 25, 2020
10,829
the wilderness
I'm not sure anyone said they don't have sympathy. I didn't.

Oh! I didn't necessarily mean "in this thread". But it's something I'm hearing a lot in various discussions about this show.

I just also don't think the doc gave proper context for Mark Vicente's background, and that really jumped out at me from the moment of his introduction since I knew something about him prior (I didn't follow this NXIVM news at all really, so had no idea he was involved until the doc). There's a reason he climbed so high so fast and it's not just because he had media experience, it's because he also previously had explicit interests in woo-woo pseudoscience and psychobabble. I think ignoring that kind of thing is missing part of the story.

I don't disagree with what you're saying, but I don't think the doc does a very good job of exploring those elements. I don't think it directly says much at all about "making sure society can meet people's needs, changing the conditions that push people to these cults." I don't think there's much inspection of the circumstances that allow a group like this to thrive. It's lacking an outside voice, which I think problematically allows the characters in charge of the narrative and narrow its scope.

Like, somewhat tangentially, I'd have loved a moment of exploration about the Mexican chapter of the cult in last night's episode. We get to see a little of Raniere talking to them, and Vicente says it was full of wealthy people and that there's money down there, but it doesn't go beyond that. I'd have loved a little discussion about why the group was attracting a very particular slice of the population, and the interactions between their class status and greater Mexican social problems.

Yeah, I think you're right. I do agree this show has many flaws. It's far from being perfect... I'm curious to see how season 2 will turn out.

But ultimately, like I said, I liked how it gave some insight into what a modern cult can look like.
 

Aiii

何これ
Member
Oct 24, 2017
8,181
And I'm giving serious side-eye to the people saying they don't have any sympathy for the victims. I don't believe anybody saying that they (or their loved ones) are so balanced that they will never fall prey to such things.
Listen, I'm not one of those that doesn't have sympathy for the victims, but I do acknowledge it takes a certain type of personality to be prone to indoctrination and psycho babble and likewise there's personalities that are never going to be that. So yeah, I can tell you that no matter what my emotional state, my skeptical and analytical approach to life will keep me from buying into any type of guru or self proclaimed genius.

If I can chose to reject Catholicism at age 8 as the pastor comes to class to indoctrinate us in preparation of the first communion, I feel confident that as an adult I'd not fall for Keith's nonsense.

That said, cult members are victims, whether it's this cult or something more prolific like Scientology, those that make it out and those that actively start fighting it especially should be supported. No matter how high up they were in the organization, they all fell victim to systematic indoctrination, and that's tough to beat.
 

Conditional-Pancakes

The GIFs of Us
Member
Jun 25, 2020
10,829
the wilderness
Listen, I'm not one of those that doesn't have sympathy for the victims, but I do acknowledge it takes a certain type of personality to be prone to indoctrination and psycho babble and likewise there's personalities that are never going to be that. So yeah, I can tell you that no matter what my emotional state, my skeptical and analytical approach to life will keep me from buying into any type of guru or self proclaimed genius.

If I can chose to reject Catholicism at age 8 as the pastor comes to class to indoctrinate us in preparation of the first communion, I feel confident that as an adult I'd not fall for Keith's nonsense.

That said, cult members are victims, whether it's this cult or something more prolific like Scientology, those that make it out and those that actively start fighting it especially should be supported. No matter how high up they were in the organization, they all fell victim to systematic indoctrination, and that's tough to beat.

I totally understand the sentiment. All I can say is that what you are describing is you in the present, and it was you in the past. How can you be that certain about your future? How can you be so sure that there won't be any type of hardship or tragedy happening to your future self that would leave you a bit vulnerable and in serious need of a community and recognition? I can promise you that no matter who you are and what you're believing in, you can't be certain that it 100% cannot happen to you. It maybe wouldn't be a something exactly like what's in the documentary, but these things come in many forms and in many flavors.

It probably and hopefully won't happen to you, but having the conviction that one is 100% above all of this is misunderstanding how these things work. As I said, people cannot be educated about not joining a cult. You can be sure that if us as a society don't find ways to be there for people that find themselves angry, alone, or in need of guidance (for whatever reasons), cults will be there. It's not a question of personality types or intelligence.
 
Oct 28, 2017
6,119
I totally understand the sentiment. All I can say is that what you are describing is you in the present, and it was you in the past. How can you be that certain about your future? How can you be so sure that there won't be any type of hardship or tragedy happening to your future self that would leave you a bit vulnerable and in serious need of a community and recognition? I can promise you that no matter who you are and what you're believing in, you can't be certain that it 100% cannot happen to you. It maybe wouldn't be a something exactly like what's in the documentary, but these things come in many forms and in many flavors.

It probably and hopefully won't happen to you, but having the conviction that one is 100% above all of this is misunderstanding how these things work. As I said, people cannot be educated about not joining a cult. You can be sure that if us as a society don't find ways to be there for people that find themselves angry, alone, or in need of guidance (for whatever reasons), cults will be there. It's not a question of personality types or intelligence.

Surely personality types and "intelligence" do play a role? Personality especially. Some people desire personal contact more than others, wouldn't they be more susceptible?

I do agree that there is probably no one who is truly immune -- we just haven't been put in the life situation that would make us susceptible to it.
 

TDLink

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
8,411
Yikes!!

The first season definitely had many flaws, but I did enjoy it. I'll probably watch season 2.

And I'm giving serious side-eye to the people saying they don't have any sympathy for the victims. I don't believe anybody saying that they (or their loved ones) are so balanced that they will never fall prey to such things. These organizations prey on vulnerable people by giving them community and love. Nobody can pretend they'll never face enough hardship in their life that they won't ever get vulnerable to cults like these.

The thing to understand is that you cannot educate or berate people into not joining cults. That's not how it works. The only way to stop shit like this is by making sure society can meet people's needs, changing the conditions that push people to these cults. Because these predatory organizations are unfortunately the only place some people can find to fill the emotional void they have in their life. The hundreds of members of the organization in this documentary weren't just dumb, simple-minded people.
Yeah, I don't mean to say Mark and others are presented as overly sympathetic, but I also think the doc is a little coy about being critical or drawing specific conclusions about how the cult operated and who it preyed on, and thus on some of the personality traits of the doc's main characters. There's a lot for viewers to read between the lines of and dots to connect, but it holds back from scrutinizing how the cult systematically targeted people primed to buy this pseudo-intellectual garbage, and simultaneously to push away and vilify skeptics and real critical thinkers. The doc's more explicit about how people were conditioned for more extreme behaviors once they became members (ie. leading the women into DOS) than about entry itself. There's a lot of talk about how normal people can be sucked into the group, but there's limited inspection of that claim. I suspect this is a byproduct of turning the same people into the protagonists of the story, and of the documentarians being so reliant on their footage and continued participation.
I have sympathy for them, and while I believe I would never fall victim to such indoctrination, I certainly know many could, or would. It isn't the fact that they were simply indoctrinated into/joined a cult. It is that these particular individuals also rose to very high positions within it, recruited many more into it, and tried their best to defend its leader and go after those who sought to take him down before they had their own awakening to what they were doing. Beyond that, Sarah also admits in the documentary to entering into a relationship of being someone's "slave" and having her own "slaves", as well as holding down other naked women and having them branded. Not to say she isn't a victim too, of course she is, but she can simultaneously be a perpetrator, and I believe she was. There was a line that was crossed. And while I think it is very plausible that many many many people are susceptible to being indoctrinated into a cult like NXIVM/ESP, the DOS shit was quite a large step beyond that into something actively malicious and dangerous.
 

Aiii

何これ
Member
Oct 24, 2017
8,181
Surely personality types and "intelligence" do play a role? Personality especially. Some people desire personal contact more than others, wouldn't they be more susceptible?

I do agree that there is probably no one who is truly immune -- we just haven't been put in the life situation that would make us susceptible to it.
This right here. Emotionality is one aspect of it, as Conditional-Pancakes correctly argues, but there are other aspects to it, too. And that mix is where the susceptibility to those particular thing lies.

I can guarantee you I will never be the person to join a cult or start believing in pseudoscience or complot theories. Not because I can't get emotional, but simply because my personality regardless of emotional state is not such that would ever be open to it.

I'd sooner be an alcoholic or drug addict than a cult follower, so to say.

But that's a personality thing, not an emotional thing, and it just differs from person to person.
 

Conditional-Pancakes

The GIFs of Us
Member
Jun 25, 2020
10,829
the wilderness
That's a very interesting discussion I think. One thing is certain is that this documentary, even with all its (many) flaws, shows that cults in general are far from being a relic of the past, unfortunately.
 

Deleted member 5853

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
12,725
Mike White is back on HBO!
www.hollywoodreporter.com

HBO Snags Limited Series From ‘Enlightened’ Creator Mike White

HBO has ordered a limited series called <em>The White Lotus</em> from <em>Enlightened</em> creator Mike White.

HBO has ordered a limited series from Enlightened creator Mike White.

The six-episode series, titled The White Lotus, is set to begin production in Hawaii this month, following strict COVID-19 guidelines. Murray Bartlett (Looking, Tales of the City), Connie Britton(Dirty John, Friday Night Lights) and Jennifer Coolidge (2 Broke Girls) head the cast.

"Mike is an unparalleled talent whose groundbreaking work has transformed both the film and TV space," said HBO Programming executive vp Francesca Orsi. "We couldn't be happier to collaborate with him again on yet another hilarious and perceptive piece that exposes the complexities of life and humanity itself."

The White Lotus is described as a social satire. It follows the staff and guests at a tropical resort over the course of a week. White is writing, directing and executive producing.

The cast also includes Alexandra Daddario (Baywatch, San Andreas), Fred Hechinger (Eighth Grade), Jake Lacy (Girls, Mrs. America), Brittany O'Grady (Apple's Little Voice), Natasha Rothwell (Insecure), Sydney Sweeney (Euphoria) and Steve Zahn (The Good Lord Bird).
 

Captjohnboyd

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,569
That's a very interesting discussion I think. One thing is certain is that this documentary, even with all its (many) flaws, shows that cults in general are far from being a relic of the past, unfortunately.
Throughout the entire show I constantly thought of the 35-42% of Americans who fully buy in to what the GOP or Trump are selling. It's indoctrination on a mass scale.

The trick is getting someone slightly invested in the beginning. Once you've taken that small step it becomes easy to control people. Most people are so deathly afraid of admitting that they were wrong to believe the initial lie that they will bend over backwards to justify it. In the end the victim does most of the heavy lifting of keeping the lie alive
 

vypek

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,538
Dammit, I forgot that Archer was only 8 episodes until that calendar reminded me. Also nice to see all the upcoming shows. I'll soon have more things to watch.
 
Oct 25, 2017
22,309

Deleted member 5853

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
12,725
tvline.com

The Crown: Dominic West Set to Play Prince Charles in Season 5 (Report)

Dominic West ('The Wire,' 'The Affair') will reportedly play Prince Charles in Season 5 of the Netflix royal drama 'The Crown.'

The actor has signed on to play Prince Charles in Season 5 of Netflix's The Crown, according to a report from the UK's The Sun. The royal drama's fifth season will chronicle the crumbling marriage between Charles and Princess Diana, played by The Night Manager's Elizabeth Debicki, after rumors of infidelity swirl about Charles and his former lover Camilla Parker Bowles. (Imelda Staunton will take over the lead role of Queen Elizabeth II in Season 5, with Jonathan Pryce playing Prince Philip.)
 

firehawk12

Member
Oct 25, 2017
24,161
I really need to find a way to get TV news to me lol

I just found out about the West Wing reunion special and as much as I hate modern Sorkin, there's something comfortable about seeing everyone back again performing political fan fiction - particularly given the nightmare world we live in now. lol
 

vhoanox

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,156
Vietnam
I really need to find a way to get TV news to me lol

I just found out about the West Wing reunion special and as much as I hate modern Sorkin, there's something comfortable about seeing everyone back again performing political fan fiction - particularly given the nightmare world we live in now. lol

Just stick to Deadline lol. They like the fastest tv news. And I love how readable their site is, much easier to follow than Variety and Hollywood Reporter.
 

Aiii

何これ
Member
Oct 24, 2017
8,181
let's not pretend any of us watched Away :p
I mean, I didn't watch a ton of stuff on Netflix (before I cancelled my sub, of course) anymore. For one, they released too much stuff and they were competing for my TV time with other services, so there wasn't even time. For another, their cancellation method of waiting two months and then cancelling a show made it more logical to not watch anything until you're sure it's not cancelled.

They're really shooting themselves in the foot here with their business model. Too many shows, greenlight everything, cancel everything. It's just such a devaluation of your service, especially now that they're increasingly losing out legacy shows people might watch on there, they need to be a reliable outlet.

At the moment, I'd sooner watch something on HBO Max, Amazon, or Apple TV+, than something on Netflix, because at least I know I won't get stung there.
 

TheNatureBoy

Member
Nov 4, 2017
10,786
They're really shooting themselves in the foot here with their business model. Too many shows, greenlight everything, cancel everything. It's just such a devaluation of your service, especially now that they're increasingly losing out legacy shows people might watch on there, they need to be a reliable outlet.

I'm curious about their internal numbers, because it seemed like Away did well when it launched. I remember seeing it in the Top 10 for a number of weeks. Maybe it was expensive vs. the numbers it brought in, but I can't imagine something like Teenage Bounty Hunters being that expensive with no big star like Hillary Swank fronting it and I saw TBH in the Top 10 as well.

I'm guessing that isn't a good metric to measure the likelihood of a show being renewed going forward.
 

Aiii

何これ
Member
Oct 24, 2017
8,181
Their top 10 means nothing. Dark Crystal was in the top 10 for a while and that didn't save it. I wouldn't be shocked if it isn't tied to numbers now, you know.
Dark Crystal was super expensive, so there's that factor of it, too.

Aside from that, I think Netflix really suffers from their binge-release style. There's a reason almost nobody does it anymore (except for shows they have no faith in to begin with), there's value in letting a show's episode marinate for a week and allow it to be discussed outside of the household. It also would help with their need to release 8 new shows and movies every week if you can stretch a show over a longer period.
 

vhoanox

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,156
Vietnam
I have a feeling beside their mega hit series that will get a pity 3-seasons (because they want to avoid negotiating new contracts which mean all talents will get a raise). Maybe Netflix don't care if any other series finished or not, good or not or even have decent rating. Their internal research must show that if they continue to streaming new tv series a week, 52 tv series a year, people will continue to subscribe. Like throwable junk foods.

Netflix market cap is bigger than a whole Disney for some times now, I don't think they will change their way any time soon.

P/s:
https://deadline.com/2020/10/jane-wiseman-exits-netflix-vp-original-series-1234598609/

"I'm grateful for all that Jane has contributed during her 6+ years at Netflix, from building a talented creative team to bringing our members such successful series as Grace and Frankie, Ozark, Dead to Me and our adult animation slate," Bajaria said. "We wish her well for the future."

One more long time VP exits. I guess because Netflix will focus more on international productions. I also notice things like The Social Dilemma and true crime documentaries, , superstars documentaries like Taylor Swift or BlackPink often debut no.1 in my country. I wonder if they are cheaper to make than tv shows.
 

RatskyWatsky

Are we human or are we dancer?
Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,931
Their top 10 means nothing. Dark Crystal was in the top 10 for a while and that didn't save it. I wouldn't be shocked if it isn't tied to numbers now, you know.

I wouldn't say that their Top 10 means nothing, but I also don't think their US Top 10, which I believe is all US subscribers can view, paints the full picture. 'Away' might have done well enough in the US, but could have bombed most everywhere else. Given its presumed limited appeal on the global stage, they probably couldn't justify the cost to keep it around just for US audiences.

International markets are absolutely huge for Netflix and going forward they'll probably dictate most of what sticks around long term barring the rare US centric phenom (like if Stranger Things hit the zeitgeist in the US but didn't do well outside the US, I'd expect Netflix to keep it around anyway).
 

Bus-TEE

Banned
Nov 20, 2017
4,656
Reading between the lines Away was exec produced by Matt Reeves and while he doesn't have his Tv deal with Netflix (that's with WB) he does have a big money film deal with them...

Looks like Netflix aren't in the business of keeping their talent happy with random, big money renewals anymore.

let's not pretend any of us watched Away :p

This.
 

CrichtonKicks

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,183
Away seemed like it got next to no buzz and it looked reasonably expensive to produce. There really wasn't any sense that it could be a long term grower.