For all the supposed threat Trump represents and the enthusiasm sparked by his possible impeachment, Western media continue to march lockstep behind his administration's coups in Latin America.
For Reuters (11/14/19), the self-proclaimed head of state is the "Bolivia interim president," whereas the elected president is just "Morales."
Áñez has been sympathetically described as a "qualified lawyer" (
BBC,
11/13/19), a "proud Christian" (
France 24,
11/13/19) as well as a "women's rights activist and television presenter" (
Time,
11/12/19).
Reuters (
11/13/19) called her "Bolivian Interim President Jeanine Áñez,"
AP (
11/13/19) had her as "Bolivia's newly declared interim president," whereas for the
BBC (
11/13/19) she was simply "President Áñez."
AFP (published in
France 24,
11/13/19) described her as "the South American country's 66th president and the second woman to hold the post."
This language mirrors corporate media profiles of Venezuelan coup leader Juan Guaidó (
FAIR.org,
7/23/19), who was depicted as a "freedom fighter" (
Fox Business,
1/29/19) and a "salsa-loving baseball fan" (
Reuters,
1/23/19) who had "captured the heart of the nation" (
New York Times, 3/4/19). References to Guaidó as "president," however, have dwindled in the face of his repeated failure to seize power (
FAIR.org,
7/23/19).
Meanwhile, corporate outlets have euphemistically labeled Áñez as "conservative" (
Guardian,
10/13/19;
New York Times,
10/12/19;
Reuters,
10/13/19), eliding any mention of her far-right, virulently anti-indigenous politics. Áñez is a member of the right-wing Democratic Social Movement from the eastern lowland region of Santa Cruz, historically a bastion of separatist groups and home to some of the most powerful Bolivian oligarchic families. She has a history of making glaringly racist remarks, tweeting in 2013 (
6/20/13) that the "Aymara New Year," an indigenous holiday, was "Satanic": "There is no replacement for God." Just days before seizing power, she questioned on
Twitter (
11/6/19) whether some people being interviewed could really be Indigenous—because they were wearing shoes. For all of liberal journalists' virtue-signaling concerning minority rights in the global North, the silence is deafening when it comes to blatant racism from pro-US elites in Latin America.
Áñez has another scandal brewing, which has yet to be reported in the English-speaking press: Her nephew was arrested for drug trafficking in 2017. According to
EFE (
10/20/17), Carlos Andrés Áñez Dorado was arrested in Brazil on October 15, 2017, in possession of 480 kilograms of cocaine—more than half a ton.
Given the extensive coverage corporate journalists gave to the arrest and conviction of Venezuelan first lady Cilia Flores' "narco-nephews" in 2015–17 (e.g.
Business Insider,
10/31/16;
Miami Herald,
12/13/17;
Daily Beast,
12/15/17), one could expect equally damning exposés in the case of Áñez. Readers shouldn't hold their breath.
In addition to whitewashing Áñez, corporate journalists have sought to sanitize the image of the figure widely considered to be the real force behind the coup: Christian fundamentalist multimillionaire Luis Fernando Camacho.
Camacho is quite literally a
fascist who got his political start in the sieg-heiling Santa Cruz Youth Union, an ultra-right paramilitary outfit that was instrumental in the Santa Cruz oligarchy's 2008 US-backed secessionist plot which ultimately failed.
But none of this appears to matter to the Western media, which have portrayed Camacho as a "conservative protest leader" (
BBC,
11/13/19), "a firebrand Christian" (
Financial Times,
11/12/19) and a "civic leader" (
Reuters,
11/7/19).
Also notoriously absent from mainstream coverage of the Bolivia coup are references to the fascist tactics employed by the opposition. Images and reports on social media showed MAS leaders
attacked by mobs,
tied to trees, their houses
set on fire and several being forced to resign by opposition violence. Instead, corporate journalists innocuously described the increasingly violent right-wing mobilizations as "mass protests" (
BBC,
10/31/19), "dissent" (
AP,
11/8/19) and "civil disobedience" (
New York Times,
10/31/19).
The right-wing violence was framed as "clashes" (
DW,
11/8/19;
France 24,
11/8/19) over "controversial" or "disputed" electoral results (
Washington Post,
11/07/19;
BBC,
11/7/19) enabling the US-backed opposition to don the mantle of pro-democracy protesters. To bolster this "fraud" narrative, Western journalists uncritically repeat the US-financed OAS' claims of "irregularities," and largely ignore a
CEPR report that found no evidence discrediting the results.