I've met him a few times, yes. I'm not sure why my point missed, all I'm saying is it's weird to not seperate art from artist and to pre-judge people based on other people's idiosyncracies. Didn't know that was so controversial.
I'm going to indulge your apparent pedantic qualities -- part of the reason the videos were widely circulated was their surreal nature. People seemed to be unsure whether they were jokes/some sort of satire/completely serious/some combination. I am sure some people now claim to unironically like their music videos.
Regardless, I've only ever seen Flynt Flossy wearing what appears to be a fake, Groucho Marx mustache and sunglasses. Most artists that I'm familiar with that operate in that somewhat inscrutable mode, tend to be mysterious and vague -- usually saying things like, "it is what it is," in relation to their work. All I was saying is that I'm surprised that his tweet regarding the 10th anniversary sounded so down to earth. To clarify, the low budget aesthetics of the videos always came off as completely intentional and not the result of financial constraints to me.
Is it controversial for me to be surprised that he was so forthcoming, when it was the mystery that initially drew so many people to Turquoise Jeep's music? Was it necessary for you to naively assume that I can't, "seperate the art from the artist?"
Unrelated, but you have been consistently misspelling, "separate."