• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Edgar

User requested ban
Banned
Oct 29, 2017
7,180
When people talk in absolutes and in a manner that what they say are actual facts and pretend that highly acclaimed , and particular media is actual some dog shit . They are the vocal minority, This whole forum consist of vocal minority .
 

The Last One

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
10,585
Actually anyone who even read about games i.e looks up info is a minority - those who talk about the games i.e post aboput them are a minority within that minority. So, we aren't talking 49 %, we are talking 5 % of players ever discussing the game and talking about issues and those 5 % don't even all agree with each other:
https://askagamedev.tumblr.com/post/149466049419/80-20-5

We (people who talk about video games with others) are the hardcore group and it's risky to assume that what we care about and what we want is what the silent majority wants, it's not something that can easily be extrapolated. I think it's important when we do get worked up over an issue not to assume that everyone else feels that way which is where reminding ourselves that we are the vocal minority comes in. It's hard to tell if that's what the OP means however as there's really not a lot of context in their post about how it's used that annoys them.

This is a really good post.
 

astro

Member
Oct 25, 2017
56,887
Yep, Era is the vocal minority by default. The opinions we express here are not indicative of the average player.
 

Van Bur3n

Avenger
Oct 27, 2017
26,089
ResetEra is absolutely a community that needs to be constantly reminded it is a vocal minority, that much is certain. Too many of y'all lack critical thinking skills to not get bopped over the head with that reminder every so often.
 

Bit_Reactor

Banned
Apr 9, 2019
4,413
Actually anyone who even read about games i.e looks up info is a minority - those who talk about the games i.e post aboput them are a minority within that minority. So, we aren't talking 49 %, we are talking 5 % of players ever discussing the game and talking about issues and those 5 % don't even all agree with each other:
https://askagamedev.tumblr.com/post/149466049419/80-20-5

We (people who talk about video games with others) are the hardcore group and it's risky to assume that what we care about and what we want is what the silent majority wants, it's not something that can easily be extrapolated. I think it's important when we do get worked up over an issue not to assume that everyone else feels that way which is where reminding ourselves that we are the vocal minority comes in. It's hard to tell if that's what the OP means however as there's really not a lot of context in their post about how it's used that annoys them.
I 1000% agree with this take, the only thing I'd say in response is that the issue still stands that majority of discourse (not limited to gaming) is repeating oft heard talking points and/or responses or parroting what someone else in a youtube video says versus actually diving into the content they're discussing or really using critical discussion skills.

I can agree that it's sill to even use but the issue is ingrained in common social media discourse that it's better to use "oof, this ain't it chief" etc and name calling and hand wave-y responses because actual conversation tends to go no where and/or is too much. I think we can better our tools of discussion while still admitting that the vocal minority point may be correct.

It becomes impossible to discuss with people when either they speak on their tastes as definitive/objective critiques or barely substantiate their claims or arguments without debating the merits and counter points of their perspectives.
 

Deleted member 10737

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
49,774
the term has its uses. when a small group complains about a certain thing so much and so often that it takes over the entire conversation, it makes it seem like their complaints are the general consensus. meanwhile most people are ok or don't even care about that thing that bothers the small group so much. in that case it needs to be pointed out that it's just a vocal minority making their voice heard, disproportionately.
 

Mik317

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,775
people here often act as if their opinion is shared by a large ammount of people.

Too often you see stuff like "this game is trash" and then whole threads act as if that is a common feeling when generally it is not. Hell look at most of the polls on this forum...very rarely the expected is the lead. So I think generally it is used fairly.

Its okay to not like something. Its just that when you attempt to make sure everyone also doesn't like it is when you will get push back.

At the end of the day, this shit is just not that serious so people who spend most of their time yelling about shit they hate will almost always be in the vocal minority camp. Go outside of this board and you will see a bunch of people like "hated" games and enjoy them despite their issues. Some take things too serious at times/
 

Thera

Banned
Feb 28, 2019
12,876
France
I find the phrase "vocal minority," especially in the context it's used in on this website, to be incredibly condescending and unproductive.
Meh, it is more a way to explained to people here that they aren't "the world" only because they are "aware users" of the media.
Saying "it's just a vocal minority lol" is basically saying "just shut up and keep quiet. Your opinions don't matter. Losers lol we won"
Never saw that, show us.
I used it on childish behavior so it is mostly the other way around.
 

Goldenroad

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Nov 2, 2017
9,475
I honestly don't need to respect any random persons opinion, whether it's the "minority opinion" or not. Respect is something that is earned. It's not a guaranteed right.
 

LavaBadger

Member
Nov 14, 2017
4,986
We are on an enthusiast forum; a niche within the hobby.

There's nothing wrong with criticism, but a good dose of self-awareness isn't going to hurt anyone either. Almost every complaint thread on this forum is going to be the result of a vocal minority. Does that mean you shouldn't complain? No. But should you also recognize that your complaints are probably not representative of the gaming audience at large and that the opinions of others and the priorities of developers are not beholden to your own? Yes, you should also do that.

Could I make a thread complaining about Madden, and how I think it's a boring series that doesn't deliver a compelling football experience? I could, but do I honestly think the developers should be catering to me? No. Being upset about the success of something just because you don't like it and it isn't catering to your desires isn't a good mindspace to occupy.
 

Lua

Member
Aug 9, 2018
1,948
When most gaming sub reddits have hundreds of thousands of subscribers, i think the sample size is large enough to be representative of a large chunk of the community, except the most casual of players.
One, there's never a situation were these people agree on any controversy, that's what makes it a controversy. So even if you were correct that point isn't valid because it assumes all those people were making the same point, which won't ever be true

two, no it isn't. In the case of pokemon, for example, 800k would be 5% of all the sales that game had until now, which is nothing. And i highly, highly doubt it ever come close to that number.
 

Deleted member 49535

User requested account closure
Banned
Nov 10, 2018
2,825
That phrase is mostly used when people start being delusional like the entire fanbase is complaining about something and it's going to be a big deal, and it the end nothing happens because the people complaining weren't actually that many and they were just being loud.

Case in point, Pokemon Sword.

I don't take it as a way of saying "your opinions don't matter", but more like "you're being overly dramatic about this".
 

Lobster Roll

signature-less, now and forever
Member
Sep 24, 2019
34,305
the term has its uses. when a small group complains about a certain thing so much and so often that it takes over the entire conversation, it makes it seem like their complaints are the general consensus. meanwhile most people are ok or don't even care about that thing that bothers the small group so much. in that case it needs to be pointed out that it's just a vocal minority making their voice heard, disproportionately.
A topic with a poll gets posted asking if people are excited for an upcoming sequel to a game. The poll results are 93/7.

Post 1: "I like this game that has a Metacritic score of 95 and sold 20 million copies. I'm excited to see what the sequel does because (reasons)."
Post 2: "Yeah, but it's irredeemable trash because the menus are ugly."

Posts 3 through 300 are then an all-out sprint to agree with Post 2.
 

Deleted member 51789

User requested account closure
Banned
Jan 9, 2019
3,705
When most gaming sub reddits have hundreds of thousands of subscribers, i think the sample size is large enough to be representative of a large chunk of the community, except the most casual of players.
Again, not really.

People who actively participate in fan subreddits/sites are generally representative of the voice of more engaged and hardcore fans of games but they still only represent that kind of fan and the views of different demographics (especially for popular titles) vary wildly.
 

Deleted member 10737

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
49,774
people here often act as if their opinion is shared by a large ammount of people.

Too often you see stuff like "this game is trash" and then whole threads act as if that is a common feeling when generally it is not. Hell look at most of the polls on this forum...very rarely the expected is the lead. So I think generally it is used fairly.
exactly. it's completely valid to have opinions and complaints that are in the minority and not shared by many. no one will come at you for that. it's when you try to make it seem like your opinion is the correct one and others have it wrong or try to call out others for sharing your fringe opinion (to the point of being annoying) that you become part of the so called vocal minority.
 

MisterR

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,463
Vocal Minority used to mean something in the early 2000s when you could pretty much guarantee that the bulk of the user base wasn't really on internet forums or posting comments on articles, but now I think enough users are on reddit or on official forums and fansites that they can hardly be called the minority.

Also like other's have said, people who are happy aren't gonna be posting about how happy they are, people only raise their voice when they aren't happy about something.
Not even close. Most people who play games, or watch a movie or tv show or whatever are never going to go on a message board and comment on it. They remain the minority.
 

Agamon

Member
Aug 1, 2019
1,781
So, it's not coincidental that most of my reply posts here could simply be replaced with "LOL"....
 

Flame Flamey

Member
Feb 8, 2018
4,624
I dislike it because I associate it with Nixon and the "silent majority" who supported him regarding Vietnam against the "vocal minority" protesting Vietnam.

Being part of either group doesn't mean you're right or wrong. Sometimes the majority is wrong, and sometimes they're right.

Anyway this is gaming, not politics
 

Fredrik

Member
Oct 27, 2017
9,003
I like this expression since it's almost always true on these websites. We're all a minority really, the majority think COD, GTA, FIFA, Fortnite, Minecraft and Roblox are the best games ever made.
 

rras1994

Member
Nov 4, 2017
5,742
I 1000% agree with this take, the only thing I'd say in response is that the issue still stands that majority of discourse (not limited to gaming) is repeating oft heard talking points and/or responses or parroting what someone else in a youtube video says versus actually diving into the content they're discussing or really using critical discussion skills.

I can agree that it's sill to even use but the issue is ingrained in common social media discourse that it's better to use "oof, this ain't it chief" etc and name calling and hand wave-y responses because actual conversation tends to go no where and/or is too much. I think we can better our tools of discussion while still admitting that the vocal minority point may be correct.

It becomes impossible to discuss with people when either they speak on their tastes as definitive/objective critiques or barely substantiate their claims or arguments without debating the merits and counter points of their perspectives.
I do agree with this. Alot of this comes from the idea that it's a fact if a game is good or terrible, like it's something that can be objectified, so we have people extrapololating their opinion on others and declaring this is fact and if something is a "fact" we aren't going to go deep on our interpretation or discuss why we feel the way do or consider that others coming from different background, preferences, experiences are going to have a different interpretation and that it's natural for them to feel that way. The discussion in gaming is inherently confrontational, and a lot of it I think comes from the console warring history of gaming which encouraged us to build up an identity in a particular game or company which means if we are disappointed by it or someone else does even a mild critique of something we like it can feel like an attack on ourselves. I don't really know what the solution is for that but i do feel like it's holding us back from more thoughtful critques and discussions which would be beneficial for both the community and industry as a whole.
 

CloseTalker

Member
Oct 25, 2017
30,546
When most gaming sub reddits have hundreds of thousands of subscribers, i think the sample size is large enough to be representative of a large chunk of the community, except the most casual of players.
Also worth noting that the amount of people subscribed to a subreddit, and the amount of people actively engaged in that community in terms of posting content or commenting, are drastically different numbers. Subscribing to a subreddit is a super low effort, low engagement thing, so its a nebulous stat
 

zombiejames

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,918
You'd think the whole "vocal minority" thing would have died in 2013 after the whole Xbox DRM thing. Or more recently with Apple killing the butterfly keyboard and brining back the ESC key in the MacBook Pro. Companies do listen (sometimes).
 

Glio

Member
Oct 27, 2017
24,497
Spain
When talking about sales it is a completely valid term because you can obtain objective data.
 

Deleted member 3294

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,973
the term has its uses. when a small group complains about a certain thing so much and so often that it takes over the entire conversation, it makes it seem like their complaints are the general consensus. meanwhile most people are ok or don't even care about that thing that bothers the small group so much. in that case it needs to be pointed out that it's just a vocal minority making their voice heard, disproportionately.
This. A good example of this is with Pokemon Sword and Shield. If you'd listen to the fanbase online, the people complaining about it are by far the loudest, which'd make you think that the consensus is that it's a failure.

When you look at the game's sales numbers, it's already sold more than 16 million copies and it's the fastest selling Switch game so far.

I do agree that "it's just a vocal minority" isn't a good reason at all to dismiss concerns though.
 

mikhailguy

Banned
Jun 20, 2019
1,967
I think "vocal" is the keyword here...and it is functioning as an understatement. It's not that people in the minority are simply voicing an opinion...they are often taking an extreme position so they can call attention to themselves.

example: "last of us/botw/god of war (2018) are the worst game(s) ever"
 

FrostweaveBandage

Unshakable Resolve
Member
Sep 27, 2019
6,611
Vocal minority, as a term, is almost always used when someone with no opinion has asked for confirmation about something within a game that they heard from someone else was bad. So what we have here is someone looking to try out a product, and maybe they read somewhere that this and that were an issue and made the game unplayable. It's the whole reason literally unplayable became a meme. Because literally unplayable to the vocal minority may be perfectly fine for 90% of gamers. And others who are fans of a game don't want to see someone with that opinion harm the company that makes a product they like.

A story my mother told me once was that, in high school, she was good friends with a girl in her class. That girl didn't like this other girl and said a lot of mean things about her. Years later, she ran into "the other girl" at a party and talked with her. Turns out they had a lot in common and became very close friends after that. The lesson is that you can't always take a minority opinion and run with it as gospel. Now, if a lot of people think you're an asshole, then maybe you should look into that. The gaming analogy there is that some games really do end up like Warcraft 3: Reforged and piss off a lot of people.
 

LavaBadger

Member
Nov 14, 2017
4,986
You'd think the whole "vocal minority" thing would have died in 2013 after the whole Xbox DRM thing. Or more recently with Apple killing the butterfly keyboard and brining back the ESC key in the MacBook Pro. Companies do listen (sometimes).

You assume the "vocal minority" aspect is what drove these decisions.

While these may have contributed to narratives and memes around these decisions, there's also every reason to believe these reasons were economic more than anything else.

If people don't buy Xboxes (Regardless if they complain online as to why, and ignoring the fact that there was a cheaper, more powerful option in front of them), then MS makes a decision because their numbers are down.

Apple replaces their keyboards because they are seeing an impact to their bottom line due to all of the keyboards they are having to fix.

The a-to-b on people complaining on a forum to companies making change is not as clear as you make it sound.
 

The Last One

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
10,585
people here often act as if their opinion is shared by a large ammount of people.

Too often you see stuff like "this game is trash" and then whole threads act as if that is a common feeling when generally it is not. Hell look at most of the polls on this forum...very rarely the expected is the lead. So I think generally it is used fairly.

Its okay to not like something. Its just that when you attempt to make sure everyone also doesn't like it is when you will get push back.

At the end of the day, this shit is just not that serious so people who spend most of their time yelling about shit they hate will almost always be in the vocal minority camp. Go outside of this board and you will see a bunch of people like "hated" games and enjoy them despite their issues. Some take things too serious at times/

Usually when a thread is created to talk about a particular game's negatives it will only attract people who think the same way. That's a pattern I have noticed at least, this is also probably true for a thread created to talk about a particular game's strengths.
 

Strangelove_77

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
13,392
Well if you're the minority you factually don't matter. Things won't get catered to you. This website has a ton of members not connected to the outside world. By that I mean normal fucking people. If you get all your info from the Era bubble or other places that are similar then you'll never know the other side of things. And by that I don't mean the "bad" stuff (were all saints here), I mean everything else.

But I think the reason people call so many people out on here for that reason is that the mindset of members here is "but Era and my friends all feel like I do so the entire world probably does too." You guys talk like it's factual. You need to be brought down to earth. For all our sakes.
Living in a bubble isn't healthy.
Mostly stop being so smug.
 

Csr

Member
Nov 6, 2017
2,029
I agree, that phrase is used very often to dismiss criticism and it fails to do that for many reasons, some already mentioned.
-No data to back this up, a game selling many units doesn't mean the majority who bought it doesn't have complaints.
-49% is also the minority
-Even if it is a minority that is vocal about something this doesn't make their opinion invalid or insignificant.
 

Deleted member 49438

User requested account closure
Banned
Nov 7, 2018
1,473
It also makes me think that people who use that term are super insecure. It's possible to love a game without trying to pass off people who criticize as irrelevant noise.

It's also possible to criticize a game without antagonizing other people that enjoy a game or the developers of said game, even though that's frequently the case on this site. Thankfully the majority of people that engage in criticism of a game do so in a reasonably respectful manor, and it's just the vocal minority of the critics that are actively toxic.

Basically, it all depends on context, and there is nothing inherently wrong with the phrase.
 

Minsc

Member
Oct 28, 2017
4,118
When a game like Pokemon can sell 16M copies, and almost every single thing I've read about it here has been negative, I think the term still applies. Unless you want to argue that people who buy Pokemon games enjoy bad games I guess.

But I think it's more likely what the people complaining don't like actually doesn't matter to the majority of people buying the game.

It doesn't mean it's less valid a complaint, but what it means is not everything is made to appease you.

Just like in Hollow Knight how people complain about the map and traveling around. Fine. But not everything is made to make you happy, so go ahead and complain and move on, but know other people probably enjoy the stuff you don't and that's why it is like it is, not because it's bad or it is some terrible system that is unfair, it's because people really enjoy it and you don't, and that's ok.
 

Deleted member 59109

User requested account closure
Banned
Aug 8, 2019
7,877
It's mainly used when people are being overly critical of something and acting like their opinions are "objective". Just kind of reminding them that everybody might not feel the same way.
 

foxuzamaki

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
21,550
Vocal minority pops up because so many gamers on forums think their opinions are the dominate one and anything else is a outlier opinion or is just wrong.

Gamers tend to lack perspective on how a game is actually recieved and tend to lean in on saying a game is either a terrible shit pile or blessed by the lord miyamoto himself.
 

CenturionNami

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Nov 2, 2017
5,230
Is this reaction to the fact Dexit was a huge failure? The huge sales Sword and Shield got just proved that was a vocal minority.